期刊文献+

WTO安全例外条款的限制性适用 被引量:6

Possible Ways to Tame the Mysterious WTO Security Exception
原文传递
导出
摘要 2018年3月,特朗普总统援引模糊的安全例外条款规避WTO对关税的限制,对WTO争端解决机制乃至整个贸易体制的可靠性与合法性发起了新的挑战。WTO安全例外条款作为WTO法律机制之一,至今仍缺乏权威的条款解释、明确的适用规则以及可参考的判例。本文结合WTO实践经验与学术成果,提出互补性方案:划分安全利益类别,保证适用的灵活性;设立援引的一般性限制,保证适用的普遍性。同时,国际法基本原则应被视为最终救济手段,维护世界经贸秩序。 In March 2018,based on Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act,President Trump attempts to invoke the WTO security exception to protect national interests.Such invocation poses new challenges to the reliability and legitimacy of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and even the whole trading system.As an indispensable tool of the WTO,GATT XXI has no authorized interpretations,no explicit applying rules,and no precedents.Based on practical experience and academic development,two complementary approaches are practicable to limit the application of security exception.The differentiation of security interests embraces flexibility,while the establishment of general treaty restrictions indicates efficiency.Meanwhile,the fundamental principles of international law shall serve as the last resort.In all,utilizing appropriate tools to restrict the invocation of security exception will be of tremendous importance to the orchestration of the world trade system.
作者 李欣玥 Li Xinyue
出处 《国际经济法学刊》 CSSCI 2019年第2期80-92,共13页 Journal of International Economic Law
关键词 WTO安全例外条款 基本安全利益 自决权 贸易战 Security Exception Essential Security Interests Self-Judging Nature Trade War
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1Alford, Roger, (2012) "The Self-Judging WTO Security Exception," Utah Law Review 2011, 697-759.
  • 2Bhala, Raj, (1998a) "Book Review: International Rules: Approaches from International Law and Intemational Relations," North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 23, 738-781.
  • 3Bhala, Raj, (1998b) "National Security and International Trade Law: What the GATT Says and What the United States Does," University of Pa. Journal of International Economic Law 19, 263-317.
  • 4Emmerson, Andrew, (2008) "Conceptulizing Security Exception: Legal Doctrine of Political Excuse?" Journal of International Economic Law 11, 135-154.
  • 5Lindsay, Peter, (2003) "Note: The Ambiguity of GATT Article XXI: Subtle Success or Rampant Failure," Duke Law Journal 52, 1277-1313.
  • 6Marceau, Gabrielle and Joel Trachtman, (2002) "The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods," Journal of World Trade 36, 811-881.
  • 7Schloemann, Hannes and Stefan Ohlhoff, (1999) " 'Constitutionalization' and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence," The American Journal of International Law 93, 424-451.
  • 8Wesley, Cann, Jr., (2001) "Creating Standards and Accountability for the Use of the WTO Security Exception: Reducing the Role of Power-Based Relations and Establishing a New Balance between Sovereignty and Multilateralism," Yale Journal of International Law 26, 413-485.
  • 9WTO, (1995) "Analytical Index of the GATT," at http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/ art21 _e.pdf.
  • 10WTO, (1947) "Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment: Summary Record of the 33rd Meeting of Commission A," E/PC/T/A/SR/33, 24 July 1947.

共引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部