中美两国“和平崛起”之比较被引量：3

下载PDF

导出

摘要国际关系中一个经久不变的现象是:当霸权国的地位受到崛起国的威胁时,它们之间的竞争有可能演变为冲突。现实主义认为这种导致战争风险的权力斗争不可避免,而"和平崛起"理念恰与现实主义这种"霸权易位、战争难免"逻辑相反。中国近十多年来一直承诺要"和平崛起",而且可能在20世纪70年代改革开放启动之时就已经奉行"和平崛起"政策。回顾历史,能够声称自己是"和平崛起"的现代大国可能只有美国。中国和美国是仅有的两个试图和平崛起的大国,考察它们各自历史经历的异同是一项有研究价值的工作。美国崛起于1865—1945年,在时间上比当今中国的崛起早一个世纪,虽然中国的崛起与美国的崛起处于不同的历史发展阶段,但如果有经验可供借鉴的话,中国可以从美国崛起之路学到哪些?本文在深入分析"和平崛起"的含义和中美"和平崛起"的案例可信度的基础上,比较当今中国的崛起过程与19世纪晚期美国崛起之路的主要相似点和不同点,得出了可供中国与国际社会参考的六条经验。

作者巴里·布赞迈克尔·考克斯管传靖段然

机构地区清华大学国际关系学系

出处《国际政治科学》 CSSCI 2014年第3期114-141,共28页 Quarterly Journal of International Politics

关键词和平崛起中国崛起美国崛起

分类号 D81 [政治法律—国际关系]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献6

1巴里·布赞,琳娜·汉森,廖丹子(译),余潇枫(校).国际安全研究的演化--中国的反思与借鉴[J].国际政治研究,2012,33(1):49-62. 被引量：4
2Ross,Robert S.Chinese Nationalism and Its Discontents[J].The National Interest.2011(116)
3Yaqing Qin.Rule, Rules, and Relations: Towards a Synthetic Approach to Governance[J].The Chinese Journal of International Politics.2011(2)
4Nicholas Khoo.Fear Factor: Northeast Asian Responses to China’s Rise[J].Asian Security.2011(2)
5Jisi,Wang.China’s Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds Its Way[J].Foreign Affairs.2011(2)
6Barry Buzan.China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible&quest; <sup>&dagger;</sup>[J].Chinese Journal of International Politics.2010(1)

二级参考文献33

1Joseph S. Nye Jr. and Sean Lynne-Jones, "International Security Studies. the State of the Field " Interna- tional Security, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1988, pp. 5-27.
2Kimberly Hutching, "Dialogue between Whom? The Role of the West/Non-West Distinction in Promoting Global Dialogue in IR," Millennium. Journal oflnternational Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2011, p.643.
3Christine Sylvester, " Anatomy of a Footnote," Security Dialogue, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2007, pp. 547-58.
4Christine Sylvester, " Whither the International at the End of IR," Millennium. Journal of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2007, pp. 551-573.
5Ole Waever, "Still a Discipline after All These Debates?" in Tim Dunne et al. , eds. , International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 288- 308.
6Pinar Bilgin, "The ' Western-Centrism' of Security Studies. ' Blind Spot' or Constitutive Practice?" Secu- rity Dialogue, Vol. 41, No.6, 2010. oo.615-622.
7Thomas J. Biersteker, "Interrelationships Between Theory and Practice in International Security Studies," Security Dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2010, pp. 599-606.
8Ole Waever, "Towards a Political Sociology of Security Stud- ies, " Security Dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2010, pp. 649-658.
9Barry Buzan, "Peace, Power, and Security. Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations," Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1984, pp. 109-125.
10Barry Buzan and Lene Hansen, "Beyond The Evolution of International Security Studies," Security Dia- logue, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2010, pp. 659-667.