期刊文献+

参比制剂标定的生物等效性研究例数估算 被引量:1

Estimation of sample size in the reference-scaled average bioequivalence study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对高变异药物,在进行参比制剂标定的生物等效性试验(RSABE)设计时,就例数的选择提供一种估算方法。方法建立了数据模拟的方法,按照参比制剂标定的计算方法,估算在不同几何均值比值(GMR)、个体内变异(CVw)的情况下,达到一定的把握度时所需要的样本量。结果通过模拟计算,获得了在几何均值比值0. 85~1. 20,个体内变异30%~80%,在80%和90%把握度下所需要的例数。结论所建立的数据模拟方法求算的例数结果可用于开展RSABE的例数设计。针对高变异药物,使用参比制剂标定的三交叉试验可显著提高研究的效率。 Objective To provide a method for the estimation of sample size in the performing of reference-scaled average bioequivalence( RSABE). Methods Numerical simulation method was constructed for the estimation of sample size at specific geomean ratio( GMR),within-subject variation( CVw) and power. Results The numeral simulation method provided sample sizes at 0. 85-1. 20 range of GMR,30%-80% of CVw,80% and 90% of power. Conclusion Sample sizes calculated with present method could be used for the design of RSABE. With high variable drugs,3-period crossover RSABE is more efficient than the 4-period crossover RSABE.
作者 魏敏吉 张朴 单爱莲 冀希炜 WEI Min-ji;ZHANG Pu;SHAN Ai-lian;JI Xi-wei(Institute of Clinical Pharmacology,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期200-202,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
关键词 高变异药物 参比制剂标定的平均生物等效性 样本量 把握度 high variable drug reference-scaled average bioequivalence sample size power
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1黄钦,魏春敏.浅谈高变异药物的生物等效性研究[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2007,12(8):841-844. 被引量:15
  • 2国家食品药品监督管理局.以药动学参数为终点评价指标的化学药物仿制药人体生物等效性研究技术指导原则[EB/OL].(2016-03-18)[2016-07-11].http://www.sda.gov.en/WS01/CL0087/147583.html.
  • 3Conner DP. Bioequivalence methods for highly variable drugs and drug products. In: FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Pharmacology meeting transcript. US Food and Drug Administration- Dockets [ EB/OL ]. ( 2009-08-05 ) [ 2016-07-11 ]. http://www, fda. gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/AdvisoryCommit- teeforPharmaceuticalScienceandClinicalPharmacology! UCM179891. pdf.
  • 4Davit BM, Conner DP, Fabian-Fritsch B, et al. Highly variable drugs: observations from bioequivalence data submitted to the FDA for new generic drug applications [ J]. AAPS J ,2008,10( 1 ) : 148-156.
  • 5Davit BM, Chen ML, Conner DP, et al. Implementation of a reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for highly variable generic drug products by the US Food and Drug Administration [ J ]. AAPS J, 2012,14 (4) :915-924.
  • 6Davit BM, Patel DT. Bioequivalence of Highly Varia- ble Drugs [ M ]//FDA Bioequivalence Standards. Springer New York,2014 : 139-164.
  • 7Cook JA, Davit BM, Polli JE. Impact of biopharmaceu- tics classification system-basedbiowaivers - J ]. Mol Pharm ,2010, 7 (5) : 1539-1544.
  • 8Endrenyi L, Tothfalusi L. Regulatory conditions for the determination of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs [ J ]. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci, 2009,12 ( 1 ) : 138 - 149.
  • 9Midha KK, Rawson M J, Hubbard JW. The bioequiva- lence of highly variable drugs and drug products [ J ]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther,2005,43 (10) :485-498.
  • 10Tsang YC, Pop R, Gordon P, et al. High variabilityin drug pharmacokinetic complicates determination of bioequivalence : experience with verapamil[ J]. Pharm Res, 1996,13 (8) :846-850.

共引文献15

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部