CISG“根本违约”规则的国内外司法进一步实证研究

Study on CISG Concerning the Rule of Fundamental Breach

CISG第25条关于根本违约规则的规定具有很大的灵活性,其认定标准在实际适用时具有很大的调整空间,因此,各国法院和仲裁机构在适用公约认定根本违约的司法实践中,也就必然出现对根本违约认定标准的不同理解和认识,从而导致对该规则的'国别化'适用。本文旨在整理分析一些主要贸易大国对CISG制度在实际司法中的适用情况,以便读者了解CISG条文和CISG司法实践之间所存在的差距。

For courts and arbitral tribunals of different countries Art.25 of CISG concerning the rule of fundamental breach does not seem to be identically understood internationally so,as a result it is flexibly applied in different jurisdiction,leaving much uncertainties in the application of the rule.Focusing on this point through judiciary cases of several important world trading states this article clearly emphasizes that the problem is due to the different comprehension of the same provision and different standards in determining the facts of"fundamental breach",and at same time pointing out the tendency for different courts and arbitral tribunals in localizing this rule when being applied.