摘要
传闻证据本质特征、即对陈述人而言 ,他并非亲自感知案件事实 ;对诉讼当事人而言 ,他们无法对传闻证据进行交叉询问 ,两大法系均限制传闻证据的使用 ,英美法系认为传闻证据会剥夺当事人的询问权 ,因此确立了传闻规则 ;大陆法系认为传闻证据有违直接言词原则 ,我国确立传闻规则具有必要性 ,解决证人不出庭问题 。
The feature of the hearsay evidence is,to the stating person,that he doesn't know the facts of the case;but to the litigant,that they can't make the intersecting ask about the hearsay evidence.Two big law systems both make the limited use of the hearsay evidence.British American system thinks that the hearsay evidence will deprive the litigants' rights of the intersecting ask,so they established the hearsay rule.Mainland system thinks that the hearsay evidence violates the rule of direct stating.It's necessary for our country to establish the hearsay rule,solving the problem that witness is absent from the court,putting forward the primary conception.
出处
《贵州工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2002年第3期40-43,共4页
Journal of Guizhou University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
传闻
证据
限制
使用
hearsay
evidence
limit
use