期刊文献+

论传闻证据规则 被引量:1

Discussion on the Hearsay Evidence Rule
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传闻证据本质特征、即对陈述人而言 ,他并非亲自感知案件事实 ;对诉讼当事人而言 ,他们无法对传闻证据进行交叉询问 ,两大法系均限制传闻证据的使用 ,英美法系认为传闻证据会剥夺当事人的询问权 ,因此确立了传闻规则 ;大陆法系认为传闻证据有违直接言词原则 ,我国确立传闻规则具有必要性 ,解决证人不出庭问题 。 The feature of the hearsay evidence is,to the stating person,that he doesn't know the facts of the case;but to the litigant,that they can't make the intersecting ask about the hearsay evidence.Two big law systems both make the limited use of the hearsay evidence.British American system thinks that the hearsay evidence will deprive the litigants' rights of the intersecting ask,so they established the hearsay rule.Mainland system thinks that the hearsay evidence violates the rule of direct stating.It's necessary for our country to establish the hearsay rule,solving the problem that witness is absent from the court,putting forward the primary conception.
作者 尹晓莉
出处 《贵州工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第3期40-43,共4页 Journal of Guizhou University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 传闻 证据 限制 使用 hearsay evidence limit use
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[8]徐静村.刑事诉讼法学(修订本)(上)[M].北京:法律出版社,1991,182.
  • 2陈瑞华.刑事审判原理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998.65.

共引文献8

同被引文献132

  • 1樊崇义,杨宇冠.论传闻证据规则[J].国家检察官学院学报,2001,9(4):59-65. 被引量:17
  • 2沈德咏,江显和.变革与借鉴:传闻证据规则引论[J].中国法学,2005(5):153-160. 被引量:28
  • 3Franklin Strier.Making Jury Trials More Truthful,1996.
  • 4Paul C Giannelli.Understanding Evidence,2003.
  • 5John H.Wigmore.Evidence in Trials at Common Law,1983.
  • 6Vinyardv.Vinyard Funeral Home,IncSWd,1968.
  • 7United Statesv.Harris,1991.
  • 8Hinton.State of Mind and the Hearsay RuleUChiLRev,1934.
  • 9Kouryv.FolloSEd(NC).
  • 10Roger C.Park."I Didn‘t Tell Them Anything About You":Implied Assertions as Hearsay Under the Federal Rules of EvidenceMinnLRev,1990.

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部