期刊文献+

血常规项目测量不确定度评定 被引量:7

Evaluation on measurement uncertainty of blood routine examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评定血常规项目的测量不确定度,探讨室内质量控制(IQC)数据结合参加希森美康网络通讯系统(SNCS)的比对数据进行不确定评定方法的可行性。方法参照CNAS-TRL-001文件,对白细胞(WBC)计数、红细胞(RBC)计数、血红蛋白(Hb)测定、红细胞比积(HCT)、血小板计数(PLT)等5个血常规项目,采用IQC数据评定实验室内测量复现性引入的测量不确定度分量,分别采用能力验证(PT)数据和SNCS数据评定偏移(bias)引入的标准不确定度,计算相对合成标准不确度及相对扩展不确定度,并比较PT数据和SNCS数据所得出的评定结果。结果各项目利用IQC数据结合PT数据评定的相对扩展不确定度,从水平1到水平3依次为:WBC(10.02%、7.24%、7.04%);RBC(2.40%、1.72%、1.92%);Hb(3.54%、2.56%、2.50%);HCT(4.12%、3.18%、2.86%);PLT(15.36%、8.86%、7.94%)。各项目利用IQC数据结合SNCS比对数据评定的相对扩展不确定度,从水平1到水平3依次为WBC(11.66%、7.34%、6.40%);RBC(2.26%、1.60%、1.64%);Hb(3.36%、2.36%、2.10%);HCT(3.36%、3.04%、3.18%);PLT(13.34%、8.36%、7.14%)。结论血常规项目结果的测量不确定度符合其目标不确定度的要求,可以采用IQC数据结合SNCS数据进行血常规项目测量不确定度的评定。 Objective To explore the feasibility of measurement uncertainty in complete blood count using internal quality con-trol(IQC) data associated with Sysmex Network Communication System(SNCS) comparative data .Methods Complete blood count assay including white blood cell(WBC) count ,red blood cell(RBC) count ,hemoglobin(Hb) determination ,hematocrit(HCT) values and platelet(PLT) count were involved to evaluate measurement uncertainty according to the instruction of CNAS-TRL-001 .Meas-urement uncertainty evaluation was established by internal measurement reproducibility using IQC data ,and standard measurement uncertainty by bias using proficiency testing(PT) data and SNCS data ,followed by relative combined standard measurement uncer-tainty and relative expanded measurement uncertainty was calculated .Meanwhile ,the measurement uncertainty was compared by u-sing PT data and SNAS comparative data .Results Relative expanded measurement uncertainty of the above mentioned index by u-sing IQC data associated with PT data was the following :WBC(10 .02% ,7 .24% ,7 .04% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,RBC (2 .40% ,1 .72% ,1 .92% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,Hb(3 .54% ,2 .56% ,2 .50% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) , HCT(4 .12% ,3 .18% ,2 .86% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,PLT(15 .36% ,8 .86% ,7 .94% ,from level 1 to level 3 respec-tively) .Relative expanded measurement uncertainty of the above mentioned index by using IQC data associated with SNCS compar-ative data was the following :WBC(11 .66% ,7 .34% ,6 .40% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,RBC(2 .26% ,1 .60% ,1 .64%from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,Hb(3 .36% ,2 .36% ,2 .10% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,HCT (3 .36% ,3 .04% , 3 .18% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) ,PLT (13 .34% ,8 .36% ,7 .14% ,from level 1 to level 3 respectively) .Conclusion Measurement uncertainty in complete blood cell could be estimated by using IQC data associated with SNCS comparative data , which is in accord with the instrument of target measurement uncertainty .
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第22期3232-3234,3237,共4页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 测量不确定度 扩展不确定度 血常规 measurement uncertainty expanded measurement uncertainty blood routine examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-TRL-001医学实验室一测量不确定度的评定与表达[S].2012.
  • 2中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-CL02医学实验室质量和能力认可准则(ISO15189:2003)[S].北京:计量出版社,2013.
  • 3中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-CL02医学实验室质量与能力认可准则(ISO15189:2007)[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2008.
  • 4中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNASCL02医学实验室质量与能力认可准则(ISO15189:2012,IDT)[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2013.
  • 5中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-TRL-001CNAS技术报告:医学实验室--不确定度的评定与表达[S].北京:中国合格评定国家认可委员会,2012.
  • 6中华人民共和国卫生部.WS/T403-2012临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
  • 7White GH, Farrance I. Uncertainty of measurement in quantita- tive medical testing a laboratory implementation guide[J]. Clin Biochem Rev,2004,25(4) :S1-24.
  • 8陈富,廖焕兰,熊小泉,梁艺华.两种糖化血红蛋白检测系统的方法学比对和偏倚评估[J].实用医学杂志,2009,25(18):3146-3148. 被引量:8
  • 9熊大迁,张朝明,李睿,郭华.利用分析性能σ值、不精密度及分析总误差评价相同项目使用不同参考区间检测系统的分析性能[J].国际检验医学杂志,2012,33(13):1561-1564. 被引量:7
  • 10黄宪章,王东梅,徐建华,林海标,万泽民,郑松柏,王建兵,柯培锋,徐宁,庄俊华.28个临床化学指标3种不确定度评定方法的比较[J].临床检验杂志,2012,30(12):953-956. 被引量:10

共引文献14

同被引文献38

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部