论讯问方法中欺骗的合理性与限制性

The Rationality and Restrictions of Deception in Interrogation Methods

讯问方法具有天然的欺骗性,这是符合侦查讯问规律的。讯问方法中的欺骗与威胁、引诱具有本质的区别,在侦查讯问中加以应用具有其合理性。西方主要国家对欺骗的侦查应用大都具有很大的许容度,我国《刑事诉讼法》禁止使用欺骗这一心理强迫方法,对此应作狭义解释。在目前的情况下,区分讯问方法中欺骗的法律界限,可以考虑综合合法原则、合情合理原则、其他证据佐证原则和公检法统一认识原则等进行把握。

The natural deception in interrogation methods conforms with investigation and interrogation rules.Deception in interrogation methods is essentially different from threat and temptation. It is reasonable to use deception in interrogation and investigation. There is great admissibility of using deception in interrogation in the major western countries.Deception is banned in China's Criminal Procedural Law, which needs to be narrowly interpreted. The legal boundary of differentiating deception in interrogation methods can be grasped on the basis of the principle of being comprehensively legal, rational, testified, and unified in understanding with public security organs.