期刊文献+

考虑减排投资溢出效应的供应链决策研究 被引量:5

A Study on Decision-making of Supply Chain Considering Spillover Effect of Investment on Emission Reduction
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对零售商对制造商进行投资减排产生的溢出效应问题,构建一个制造商、两个零售商组成的两级供应链,研究单一零售商投资减排和两个零售商都投资减排的供应链决策问题。研究发现,两个零售商的利润均与其自身所占市场需求规模成正比,单一零售商投资减排总能使两个零售商的利润都增加,非投资方的利润与溢出系数成正比,投资方与非投资方的利润相较于不投资时的改善度均与其所占市场需求规模成反比。通过算例对比两个零售商分别单独投资与不投资时的利润改善度,发现可能出现溢出过大的情况,从而削弱零售商投资的积极性、产生逆向选择行为。 Considering spillover effect of the retailer’s investment in the manufacturer on emission reduction,a two-level supply chain consisting of a manufacture and two retailers was setup.The supply chain decision-making on single retailer and two retailers investment on emission reduction were studied.The results show that the two retailers’ profits are directly proportional to the market share.It will always increase the profit of the two retailers if one of the retailer invests in carbon emission reduction.The profit of the retailer who doesn’t invest will be directly proportional to the spillover coefficient.Nevertheless,the improvement of the two retailers’ profits are inversely proportional to the market share.The profits’ improvement of the two retailers when they invest separately or do not invest,are compared by the numerical examples.If the overflow is too large,the investment enthusiasm of retailers will be abated and the adverse selection behaviors will come out.
作者 刘名武 王霖 LIU Ming-wu;WANG Lin(School of Economy and management,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)
出处 《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期54-63,共10页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 重庆市社科规划"研究阐释党的十九大精神"资助项目(2018sjd01) 重庆市科委基础与前沿研究项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0137) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71601031 71471024)
关键词 溢出效应 低碳偏好 合作减排 主从博弈 spillover effect emission reduction sharing low-carbon preference Stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献121

  • 1丁志刚,徐琪.供应链实施低碳技术的博弈与激励机制研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(4):13-17. 被引量:15
  • 2李丽君,黄小原,庄新田.双边道德风险条件下供应链的质量控制策略[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):42-47. 被引量:92
  • 3Raj Kumar Aggarwal.人工智能及其在含可再生能源电源的电网安全中的应用(英文)[J].电网技术,2007,31(20):46-54. 被引量:6
  • 4Baldwin R. Regulation Lite: the Rise of Emissions Trading [J]. Regula- tion & Governance, 2008,(2).
  • 5J.A. Poyago-Theotoky. The Organization of R&D and Environmental Policy [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2007, 62(1).
  • 6Cohen CM, Klepper S. The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distri- butions [J]. The American Economic Review, 1992, 82(4).
  • 7Zenger TR. Explaining Organizational Diseconomies of Scale R&D: Agency Problems and the Allocation of Engineering Talent, Ideas, and Effort by Firm Size [J]. Management Science, 1994,(6).
  • 8Jones R., Mendelson H. Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition [J]. Mangement Science,2011,57(1).
  • 9http. //www. newenergy, org. cn / Html / 0108 / 8231035117. Html.
  • 10Carbon Trust. Carbon footprints in the supply chain- the next step for business, http://teenet, tel or. th/ Knowledge/Paper/carbonfootprintinsupplychain. pdf, 2006.

共引文献316

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部