朝鲜时代阳明学本土化的考察——以霞谷郑齐斗的《大学》解释为主

A Survey on the Localization of Yangming's Theory at the Time of Korea

现在韩国学术界,关于郑齐斗思想的研究中,较为成果少而关心多的是,通过与中国阳明学的比较研究,找出郑齐斗阳明学的特色的工作。值得注意的是,既然郑齐斗是韩国阳明学的泰斗,然则郑齐斗阳明学的特征很可能表示韩国阳明学的特征。所以探索郑齐斗阳明学的特色的工作,就是一种朝鲜时代阳明学本土化的考察。当然这个工作需要长时间的磨练和尝试才能达到目标。论文的着眼处就在这个方面,为此着手于分析郑齐斗所作的《大学说》,探讨郑齐斗的《大学》观。本来朱子学和阳明学的分歧点就源对《大学》的不同理解,特别是对"格物致知"的不同理解方式。因此通过理解郑齐斗的《大学》观,会知道他转向于阳明学的过程,再进一步,可以找到与王阳明的《大学》观不同的郑齐斗《大学》观的特色。若这种尝试有效力,则可以提供理解作为阳明学的韩国式发展的霞谷学的意义,尤其是帮助理解阳明学在朝鲜时代中本土化的过程中出现的一些特征。

In the research of Deng Qidou's thought in today's South Korean academic world,main concern is given to make sure of the feature of his Yangming study compared with the same one that has been done in China. Worth to be mentioned is that Deng Qidou is the leading authority in South Korea's academy,to know his work is actually a survey on the localization of Yangming's theory at the time of Korea. The focus of this thesis is on the analysis of Deng Qidou's work on Great Learning as well as his view about Great Learning. As we know,the biggest divergence that makes Zhuzi different from Yangming lies in their different understanding of both Great Learning and the theory of Ge Wu Zhi Zhi( study the nature of things). Therefore,the try in the study of Deng Qidou may help us find out what is the peculiarity in his comprehension of Great Learning after he turned to Yangming's theory,and provide us with an approach to the meaning of Xiagu study which is considered as the South Korea's development of Yangming's theory.