摘要
必须承认,要对慈湖思想作出全面的评价,此非易事,站在不同的立场,得到的结论甚至有天壤之别。这也从某个侧面表现出宋明儒学内部的张力,是儒学在复兴运动中充满生机的体现。本文从朱子的角度出发,透过朱子对象山和慈湖的不同评价,系统地展现他们各自的学术主张与思想特色;在观念的考察之外,再结合慈湖的学行和人生经历,从而多维度呈现其思想的个性,试图最终找到合理定位。
Admittedly,it is very difficult to assess Cihu's thought in an overall way. Generally,standing on different positions,we can get totally different conclusions. Such difficulty to some extent indicates the tension in Song-Ming Confucianism,which is the expression of vigor for Confucianism in her renaissance movement. From Zhuzi's perspective,this essay is going to systematically show their academic propositions and theoretical characteristics by Master Zhu's various evaluations of Xiangshan and Cihu. Except for the idea exploration,the author would like to combine Cihu's study and governing life in order to show readers his personality by multiple dimensions and eventually find a reasonable assessment of Yang Cihu.
出处
《贵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》
2015年第5期40-46,共7页
Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences
基金
作者以教育部公派留学生身份(CSC NO.201306100067)参加复旦大学和日本九州大学联合培养博士项目(2013.10-2015.4)的中期研究成果
关键词
杨慈湖
朱子
象山
多样性
张力
Yang Cihu
Zhuzi
Xiangshan
diversity
tension