2USNRC 10 CFR 50.65. Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants[S]. 2003.
3Regulatory Guide 1.160 (Rev.2). Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants[S].1997.
4NUMARC 93-01(Revision 3). Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants[S]. 2000.
5USNRC 10 CFR 50.69. Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors (Final rule)[S]. 2004.
6HAF103-2004.核动力厂运行安全规定[S]．
7Grantom C R (Rick). PSA Techniques in Component Risk Significance Categorization for Graded Quality Assurance and Exemption from Special Treatment Requirement (risk informed part 50, option2). International Workshop on “Use of PSA in Operation of NPPs and in Regulatory Decision-Making”. May 19, 2004. Kyiv, Ukraine.
5USNRC 10 CFR 50.65. Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants[S]. 2003.
6Regulatory Guide 1.160 (Rev.2). Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants[S].1997.
7NUMARC 93-01(Revision 3). Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants[S]. 2000.
8USNRC 10 CFR 50.69. Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors (Final rule)[S]. 2004.
9HAF103-2004.核动力厂运行安全规定[S]．
10Grantom C R (Rick). PSA Techniques in Component Risk Significance Categorization for Graded Quality Assurance and Exemption from Special Treatment Requirement (risk informed part 50, option2). International Workshop on “Use of PSA in Operation of NPPs and in Regulatory Decision-Making”. May 19, 2004. Kyiv, Ukraine.
