期刊文献+

为巨额财产来源不明罪正名

The Recovery of Reputation of the Crime ofEnormous Property without Lawful Sources
下载PDF
导出
摘要 巨额财产来源不明罪在证明责任上并没有实行倒置 ,证明责任仍是由控制方承担 ,有些观点混淆了辩护权的行使与证明责任的负担。立罚并不存在有罪推定问题 ,更无从论及对无罪推定原则的背反。认为该罪属于有罪推定 ,且有违无罪推定原则的观点是将事实推定等同于推定犯罪、有罪推定 ,而且未能认清本罪的犯罪构成 。 There is no inversion on the burden of proof for the crime of enormous property without lawful sources, the burden of proof is still assumed by the persecution. Some scholars failed to differ defence from the burden of proof. This crime is not the presumption of crime, and doesn't break the principle of presumption of innocence. The arguments regarded the presumption of fact as constructive crime and the presumption of crime, but also failed to understand the constitution of the crime, and misunderstanded the characteristic of the crime.
作者 江学 罗琦
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2002年第6期56-59,共4页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 巨额财产来源不明罪 证明责任 无罪推定 推定犯罪 the crime of enormous property without lawful sources burden of proof presumption of innocence constructive crime
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献3

  • 1储槐植.三论第三犯罪行为形式“持有”[J].中外法学,1994,6(5):20-22. 被引量:105
  • 2樊祟义编.《刑事诉讼法学研究综述与评价》,中国政法大学出版社1991年11月版.第282页.
  • 3刘立宪等编著,孙谦.国家工作人员职务犯罪研究[M]中国检察出版社,1990.

共引文献77

;
使用帮助 返回顶部