期刊文献+

The Utility Additive Method and Its Usage for Studying Consumer Behavior 被引量:7

The Utility Additive Method and Its Usage for Studying Consumer Behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 Multiattribute utility theory is a powerful theory tool to reveal the preferences of the consumers according to multiple attribute points of view. Utility additive (UTA) method based on Multiattribute utility theory is an ordinal regression method using linear programming. The purpose of the UTA method presented in this paper is to assess additive utility functions that aggregate multiple attributes in a composite attribute. The results of it are important for the study of consumer behavior. Finally, a simple illustrative example is presented and some extensions of the method are proposed. Multiattribute utility theory is a powerful theory tool to reveal the preferences of the consumers according to multiple attribute points of view. Utility additive (UTA) method based on Multiattribute utility theory is an ordinal regression method using linear programming. The purpose of the UTA method presented in this paper is to assess additive utility functions that aggregate multiple attributes in a composite attribute. The results of it are important for the study of consumer behavior. Finally, a simple illustrative example is presented and some extensions of the method are proposed.
出处 《Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 CSCD 2002年第2期150-157,共8页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
基金 This project is supported by NSFC (79930900)
关键词 multiattribute utility theory linear programming consumer behavior multiattribute utility theory linear programming consumer behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Spyridakos A,Siskos Y,Yannacopoulos D,Skouris A.Multicriteria job evaluation for large organizations.European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130:375~387.
  • 2[2]Eric Jacquet-Lagreze,Yannis Siskos.Preference cisaggregation:20 years of MCDA experience.European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130:223~245.
  • 3[3]Mihelis G,Grigoroudis E,Siskos Y,Politis Y.Customer satisfaction measurement in the private bank sector.European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130:347~360.
  • 4[4]Jacquet-Lagreze E,Siskos Y.Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making:the UTA method.European Journal of Operational Research,1982,10:151~164.
  • 5[5]Keeney R L,Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives:Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.New York:Wiley,1976.
  • 6[6]Luce R.The choice axiom after twenty years.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1977,15:215~233.
  • 7[7]Michel Beuthe,Giuseppe Scannella.Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods.European Journal of Operational Research,2001,130:246~ 262.
  • 8[8]Matsatsinis Nikolaos F,Samaras Andreas P.Brand choice model selection based on consumers' multicriteria preferences and experts' knowledge.European Journal of Operational Research,2000,27:689~707.
  • 9[9]Matsatsinis Nikolaos F,Yannis Siskos.MARKEX:an intelligent decision support system for product development decisions.European Journal of Operational Research,1999,113:336~354.
  • 10[10]Keeney Ralph L.An illustrated procedure for assessing multi-attributed utility functions.Modern Decision Analysis,1977:96~111.

同被引文献52

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部