期刊文献+

雪崩危险度评价的程序和方法 被引量:5

Procedure and Methods for Avalanche Hazard Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在提出"积雪单元"概念的基础上,将雪崩危险度评价分为区域雪崩危险度评价和点位雪崩危险度评价.从发生学角度论证了雪崩发生危险度评价的参评因素和指标体系.详细论证了两类评价各自的特征、操作性评价程序和方法. The 'snowpack unit' is defined. Upon the new concept, the avalanche hazard evaluation is distinguished into regional avalanche hazard evaluation and site avalanche hazard evaluation. Factors and their grading criteria for release evaluation are determined upon full discussion. The characteristics, operational procedure and methods, for each kind of evaluation, are explored in detail.
作者 周石礄
出处 《湖南师范大学自然科学学报》 EI CAS 北大核心 2002年第4期82-87,共6页 Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40141003)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Urs Gruber, Stefan Margreth. Winter 1999: a valuable test of the avalanche-hazard mapping procedure in Switzerland [J]. Annals of Glaciology, 2001, 32: 328-332.
  • 2S. M. Myagkov, L. A. Kanaev. Geography of avalanches [M]. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 1992, (In Russian).
  • 3E. Troshkina, T. Glazovskaya, N. Kondakova, V. Sokolov. Zoning of snowiness and avalanching in the mountains of western Transcaucasia [J]. Annals of Glaciology, 2001, 32: 311-313.
  • 4齐藤隆 小岛隆 松田宏.北陆新干线の雪崩危险度评价[J].雪冰,2000,(6):29-30.
  • 5周石硚,中尾正义,桥本重将,坂井亚规子,成田英器,石川信敬.湿雪的密实化与颗粒粗化过程研究[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(3):275-281. 被引量:13
  • 6王彦龙.中国雪崩研究[M].北京:海洋出版社,1992..
  • 7Sturm. M., J. Holmgren. Differences in compaction behavior of three climate classes of snow [J]. Annals of Glaciology, 1998, 26: 125-130.
  • 8Betty Sovilla, Francesco Sommavilla, Alvise Tomaselli. Measurements of mass balance in dense snow avalanche events [J]. Annals of Glaciology, 2001, 32: 230-236.
  • 9M. Barbolini, F. Savi. Estimate of uncertainties in avalanche hazard mapping [J]. Annals of Glaciology, 2001, 32: 299-305.
  • 10仓岛收.なだれ先生斜面の先生危险度の判定基准モデルにつぃて[J].交通工学,1985,20(2):9-23.

二级参考文献3

共引文献17

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部