“船台说”可以休矣——评《广州文物考古集·广州秦造船遗址论稿专辑》

BERTH VERSION" SHOULD CEASE --Comment on Collected Papers on Guangzhou Berth Relic Site in the Qin Dynasty

根据《广州文物考古集·广州秦造船遗址论稿专辑》所报导发掘的事实 ,认为“船台说”把南越国宫殿建筑物被大火焚毁后的木柱脚 ,误认为是“木墩” ,进而把“木墩”看成可造船台的“木墩” ,又把垫木柱脚的木板 ,误为船台“滑板” ,结果道出“船台”来。所谓“船台”其实是建筑物地基木结构。

Based on the study of the excavate facts reported from The Collected Paper on Guangzhou Berth Relic Site in the Qin Dynasty, Collected Works of Guangzhou Relic Archaeology,it is considered that 'Berth Version' mistakes the wood post foot of the Palace of the Nanyue Kingdom after destruction by big fire for the wood mound, furthermore, mistakes the mound for the berth wood mound, and mistakes the plank pad under the wood post foot for the berth 'slide', as a result the 'berth' is posed. Actually the so-called 'berth' is a wood structure on the foundation of buildings.