期刊文献+

创伤抢救小组综合处置模式对多发伤患者救治效果的影响 被引量:3

Effect of comprehensive disposal model of trauma rescue team on the treatment of patients with multiple trauma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨创伤抢救小组综合处置模式对多发伤患者的救治效果。方法回顾性分析2013年4月至2015年4月我院收治的175例多发伤患者的临床诊治资料,其中以创伤抢救小组综合处置模式救治的92例患者为观察组,采用传统抢救模式救治的83例患者为对照组,比较两组患者的救治效果。结果观察组患者的抢救成功率为90.22%(83/92),明显高于对照组的77.11%(64/92),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者入院至确诊时间[(25.83±6.25)min]、急诊至手术时间[(27.95±5.37)min]、住院时间[(23.72±5.21)d]、致残率(22.83%)以及并发症发生率(8.70%)均明显低于对照组的(42.79±7.42)min、(48.94±7.62)min、(35.89±6.85)d、42.17%、20.48%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论创伤抢救小组综合处置模式能够提高多发伤患者的救治效果,改善预后,值得临床推荐使用。 Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive disposal model of trauma rescue team on the treatment of patients with multiple trauma. Methods The clinical data of 175 patients with multiple trauma in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2015 were retrospectively reviewed, among which the 92 patients were treated by the comprehensive disposal model of trauma rescue team as the observation group, while the 83 petients were treated by traditional rescue mode as the control group. The treatment effect of the two groups were compared. Results The rescue success rate in the observation group was 90.22%(83/92), which was significantly higher than 77.11%(64/92) in control group(P<0.05). The hospitalization to the final diagnosis time, emergency operation time, hospitalization time, disability rate and complication rate in the observation group were significantly lower than those in control group [(25.83 ± 6.25) min vs(42.79 ± 7.42) min,(27.95 ± 5.37) min vs(48.94 ± 7.62) min,(23.72 ± 5.21) d vs(35.89 ± 6.85) d, 22.83% vs 42.17%,8.70% vs 20.48%, P<0.05]. Conclusion Comprehensive disposal model of trauma rescue team can improve the treatment effect of patients with multiple trauma, and improve the prognosis. It is worthy of clinical recommendation.
作者 张滔 梁建
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2016年第14期2367-2369,共3页 Hainan Medical Journal
关键词 创伤抢救小组 综合处置模式 多发伤 救治效果 Trauma rescue team Comprehensive disposal model Multiple trauma Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献84

  • 1孙培龙,王宏升,胡静波,叶启发.损伤控制性手术[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2009,13(1):75-78. 被引量:21
  • 2史爱珍,严翎,王芝,姜梅.创伤严重度护理综合评分的应用研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(12):884-887. 被引量:33
  • 3张绍权,陈哲,韦武延,柏星海,周志高,黄晓,符可胜,黄德成.多发伤556例急诊救治临床分析[J].广西医科大学学报,2010,27(5):777-778. 被引量:5
  • 4崔小锋,乃远福,肖玉光.严重多发伤的急救措施[J].现代医院,2006,6(12):16-17. 被引量:4
  • 5张树基 刘仁树 王佩燕.急诊医学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002.491-494.
  • 6顾永峰,李能平,方伟敏,卢小兵,丛建农,惠小平,林兆奋,李文放,杨兴易.重度创伤急救原则的临床研究[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(10):885-887. 被引量:12
  • 7Evans JA, van Wessem K J, Mcdougall D, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic deaths : comprehensive population-based assessment [ J ]. World J Surg, 2010, 34( 1 ) :158-163.
  • 8Soles GL, Tornetta PR. Multiple trauma in the elderly: new man- agement perspectives [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25 Suppl 2 : S61 -S65.
  • 9Heffernan DS, Vera RM, Monaghan SF, et al. hnpact of socioeth- nic factors on outcomes following traumatic brain injury [ J ]. J Trauma, 2011, 70 ( 3 ) :527-534.
  • 10Choi M, Kim H, Qian H, et al. Readmission rates of patients dis- charged against medical advice : a matched cohort study [ J ]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(9) :e24459.

共引文献106

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部