摘要
《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》对高空抛物和高空坠物的行为第一次作出了明确规定,其中在第87条规定:"从建筑物中抛掷物品或者从建筑物上坠落的物品造成他人损害,难以确定具体侵权人的,除能够证明自己不是侵权人的外,由可能加害的建筑物使用人给予补偿。"此项规定被众多媒体引用,并都解读为"高空抛物邻里要连坐",这一论点引发众多争议,司法处理也引发着巨大的争议,因此,本文仍以"连坐"一词来对此行为作一深入分析。
"People's Republic of China Right infringement Responsibility Law"makes a clear definition of killer litter.Clause 87 demands that"Throws the goods or the goods from the building which crashes from the building leads to harm to other peo-ple.The user of the building should make compensation if it's difficult to ensure the right infringer,except somebody who can prove himself not the infringer."This clause is quoted by many medias and is interpreted that it's a collective punishment for Neighborhood.This argument causes many disputes and judicial processing also causes great dispute.Therefore,this article analyzes collective punishment.
关键词
高空抛物
损害
补偿
责任
killer litter
harm
compensation
responsibility
