期刊文献+

可视化微课资源对听障学生专业学习的补偿性研究 被引量:2

Research on Visualization Micro Course Resources Compensatory to Deaf Students' Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可视化微课是针对听障学生的缺陷进行补偿的一种介入式教学形式,听障学生因听分析器的缺失,对文本教材的阅读理解能力弱,现有手语配以多媒体的专业教学模式在知识的传递中欠直观、具象,造成听障学生接受信息有所缺失。可视化微课是将文本教材的内容设计转化为动态图形图像予以展现,符合听障学生读图看话习得知识的规律,能充分利用其视分析器接受信息。同时,可视化微课在专业教学的前、中、后三个阶段分别予以介入,能有效提升听障学生学习的积极性。该微课资源的可重复性和可逆性能极大的弥补听障学生对信息的高遗忘率,具有很好的缺陷补偿作用。 Visualization micro lesson is a kind of intrusive teaching forms of compensation according to the defects of deaf students,the lack of deaf students from listening to analyzer ,textbook reading comprehensionability is weak,the existing sign language with teaching mode of multimedia professional in the knowledge transfer in less intuitive,image,resulting in hearing impaired students receive information missing.Visual micro class is the text teaching material content design into dynamic graphic images to show,conforms to the deaf students interpret the images to see regular acquisition of knowledge,can make full use of the visual analyzer to receive information.At the same time,the visual micro course in professional teaching before,after, in three stages involved,can effectively enhance the enthusiasm of deaf students learning.The micro class resources reproduc-ibility and reversibility greatly make up for hearing impaired students information on the high rate of forgetting,defects with good compensation.
作者 王冠 解殿伟
出处 《湖北函授大学学报》 2015年第9期125-126 175,175,共3页
基金 2014年浙江省社会科学界联合会年度课题"可视化微课资源对听障学生专业课堂补偿性的研究"阶段成果(项目编号:2014N177)
关键词 可视化微课资源 听障学生 读图 缺陷补偿 专业学习 visualization micro course resources deaf students image reading defect compensation professional learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1Kapur, M. Productive Failure[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 2008, 26(3): 379-424.
  • 2Kaput, M. A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: unpacking the design components[J]. Instructional Science, 2011, 39(4): 561-579.
  • 3Kapur, M., &Bielaczyc, K. Designing for Productive Failure[J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2012, 21 ( 1 ): 45-83.
  • 4Kapur, M. Comparing Learning From Produc- tive Failure and Vicarious Failure[J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013, 22 (1): 1-27.
  • 5Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. Inventing to Prepare for Fu- ture Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 2004, 22(2): 129-184.
  • 6Siler, S. A., Klahr, D., & Price, N. Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity[J]. Instructional Science, 2013, 41(1): 191-216.
  • 7Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of con- structivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2006, 41(2): 75-86.
  • 8Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) [J]. Educational Psychologist, 2007, 42(2): 99-107.
  • 9Schwartz, D. L., &Bransford, J. D. A time for telling[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 1998,16(4): 475-522.
  • 10Collins, A. What is the most effective way to teach problem solv- ing? A commentary on productive failure as a method of teaching[J]. Instructional Science, 2012, 40(4): 731-735.

共引文献127

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部