期刊文献+

参照对象信息对分配公平感的影响:攀比效应与虚荣效应 被引量:6

How to Make Justice Judgment of Multiple Referents:Bandwagon Effect and Snob Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于社会比较理论,将影响分配公平感的参照对象信息分为三类:参照对象平均水平信息,与特定参照对象相比的不利信息、有利信息。采用4×2×2模拟情境实验分析了三类参照对象信息对分配公平感的影响,结果发现:参照对象平均水平信息对分配公平感影响力最大;分配公平判断中存在攀比效应,当与特定参照对象相比的不利信息呈现时,分配公平感显著降低;分配公平判断中存在虚荣效应,且在参照对象平均水平信息缺失时效应最强。 Based on social comparison theory,the information of referents can be divided into three categories:information of average(IA);information of better paid referent(IB);information of worse paid referent(IW).In this study,three hundred and twenty eight college students participated in the scenario experiment,and a 4×2×2randomized design was adopted.The results indicated that:(a)the main effect of IA was significant:the perception of distributive justice was lowest when participants were informed that they were paid less than average,and the perception of distributive justice was highest when participants knew that they got more than average;(b)the bandwagon effect was significant in all conditions of IA:when participants got IB,their perception of distributive justice decreased sharply;(c)the strongest snob effect appeared when IA was absent:when participants got IW,their perception of distributive justice increased dramatically.Finally,the theoretical and empirical implications of this study are discussed.
作者 周浩 龙立荣
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期70-76,共7页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71232001) 国家自然科学基金项目(71472129 71002047) 四川省系统科学与企业发展研究中心重点项目(xq15B04)
关键词 分配公平感 参照对象 攀比效应 虚荣效应 distributive justice referent bandwagon effect snob effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.公平感社会比较的参照对象选择研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(6):948-954. 被引量:23
  • 2刘得明,龙立荣.国外社会比较理论新进展及其启示——兼谈对公平理论研究的影响[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008,22(5):103-108. 被引量:27
  • 3周浩,龙立荣.公平敏感性研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):702-707. 被引量:34
  • 4Han‐Hui Por,David V. Budescu.Revisiting the Gain–Loss Separability Assumption in Prospect Theory[J]. J. Behav. Dec. Making . 2013 (4)
  • 5Mark Harcourt,Maureen Hannay,Helen Lam.Distributive Justice, Employment-at-Will and Just-Cause Dismissal[J]. Journal of Business Ethics . 2013 (2)
  • 6Jeroen Stouten,Peter Kuppens,Stijn Decoster.Being angry for different reasons: the role of personality in distributive justice[J]. J Appl Soc Psychol . 2013 (4)
  • 7Jonathan J. Yip,Anita E. Kelly.Upward and downward social comparisons can decrease prosocial behavior[J]. J Appl Soc Psychol . 2013 (3)
  • 8Kenneth G. Wheeler.Cultural values in relation to equity sensitivity within and across cultures[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology . 2002 (7)
  • 9Adams JS,Berkowitz L.Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology . 1965
  • 10De Cremer David,van Knippenberg Barbara,van Knippenberg Daan,Mullenders Danny,Stinglhamber Florence.Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem. The Journal of applied psychology . 2005

二级参考文献51

  • 1周浩,龙立荣,王燕,王忠军,吴怡,柯善玉.分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):687-693. 被引量:38
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.公平敏感性研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):702-707. 被引量:34
  • 3张志学.中国人的分配正义观[J].中国社会心理学评论,2005,(3):157-190.
  • 4[1]Buunk A,Gibbons F.Social comparison:The end of a theory and the emergence of a field[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2007,102:3-21.
  • 5[2]Martin R."Can I do X?":Using the proxy comparison model to predict performance[M]//Handbook of social comparison:Theory and research,Khwer Academic Publishers,2000:67-80.
  • 6[3]Buunk B.Social comparison processes among depressed individuals:evidence for the evolutionary perspective on involuntary subordinate strategies[J].Subordination,mood disorders and evolution,2000,10:147-164.
  • 7[4]Vander Z,Buunk B,Sanderman R.Neuroticism and reactions to social comparison information among cancer patients[J].Journal of Personality,1998,66:175-194.
  • 8[5]Nekich J,Agency and communion in naturalistic social comparison[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26:864-874.
  • 9[6]Richard P,Katherine A,Social comparison and confidence:When thinking you're better than average predicts overeonfdence (and when it does not)[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proceases,2007,102:76-79.
  • 10[7]Moore D.Not so above average after all:When people believe they are worse than average and its implications for theories of bias in social comparison[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,2007(102):42-58.

共引文献79

同被引文献98

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部