期刊文献+

教-学-评一致性三因素理论模型的建构 被引量:268

Constructing a Three-factor Model of Teaching-Learning-Assessment Alignment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在借鉴相关研究的基础上,从理论分析的视角概括出课堂教学中教-学-评一致性的三因素结构,即学-教一致性,教-评一致性和评-学一致性。"学-教一致性",或者说"所学即所教",是指在目标的指引下学生的学习与教师的教学之间的匹配程度;"教-评一致性",或者说"所教即所评",它是指教师的教学与对学生评价的匹配程度;"评-学一致性",也就是说"所学即所评",它是指学生的学习与对学生学习的评价之间的匹配程度。然后从实证的角度对这个三因素理论模型进行了检验。经过探索性因素分析、内部一致性效度检验和验证性因素分析发现:教-学-评一致性可以解构为三个因子,并且这一结构的信度和结构效度较好,因此,在理论上建构的课堂教学过程中教-学-评一致性三因素模型是合理的。 Based on the relevant studies,this paper,from the theoretical perspective,analyzes and sum-marizes a three-factor model of the alignment of teaching-learning-assessment-the alignment of learning-teaching,the alignment of teaching-assessment,and the alignment of assessment-learning. The model is em-pirically examined and validated. Through the exploratory factor analysis,internal consistency validity exami-nation and confirmatory factor analysis,the paper suggests that the three-factor structure of aligning teaching, learning,and assessment is reasonable with good reliability and structural validity,which verifies the rational-ity of the theoretical model from the empirical perspective.
作者 崔允漷 雷浩
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期15-22,共8页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 教育部哲学人文社会科学研究重点基地重大项目"义务教育阶段学校课程实施过程质量评估的理论和技术研究"(项目编号:11JJD880003)
关键词 教学一致性 教-学-评一致性 三因素模型 instructional alignment,teaching-learning-assessment alignment three-factor model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1S. ALAN COHEN.Instructional Alignment: Searching for a Magic Bullet. Educational Research . 1987
  • 2Porter, A.C,Smithson, J.L.Are content standards being implemented in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. From the capitol to the classroom:Standards-based reform in the states-One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part Ⅱ . 2001
  • 3Council of chief states school officers.State Standard and State Assessment Systems:A Guide to Alignment. . 2000
  • 4Hansche,L.N.Meeting three requirements of title:Handbook for the development of performances stands. . 1998
  • 5杨玉琴,王祖浩,张新宇.美国课程一致性研究的演进与启示[J].外国教育研究,2012,39(1):113-121. 被引量:37
  • 6崔允漷,夏雪梅.“教-学-评一致性”:意义与含义[J].中小学管理,2013(1):4-6. 被引量:363
  • 7Ananda,S.Rethinking issues of alignment under No Child Left Behind. . 2003
  • 8Helena Pedrosa de Jesus,Aurora Coelho Moreira.??The role of students’ questions in aligning teaching, learning and assessment: a case study from undergraduate sciences(J)Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education . 2009 (2)
  • 9RichardHall.??Aligning learning, teaching and assessment using the web: an evaluation of pedagogic approaches(J)British Journal of Educational Technology . 2002 (2)
  • 10Duncan,R.G.Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching . 2009

二级参考文献25

  • 1Norman,L.Webb. Alignment of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States [ R]. Washington, DC :Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.23.
  • 2S. Sireei,F. Robin,K. Meara,H. Rogers,H. Swaninathan. An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework [A]. N. Raju,J. Pelligrino,M. Bertenthal,K. Mitchell,L. Jones (Eds.). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP [C]. Washington, DC : National Academies Press,2000.74-100.
  • 3R. Rothman,J. Slattery,J. Vranek, L. Resnick. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing[ J ]. Educational Assessment, 2004,9 (1-2) : 1-27.
  • 4N. Webb. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education (Research Monograph No. 6) [ M ]. Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.
  • 5N. Webb. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States (Research Monograph No. 18) [M]. Washington,DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.
  • 6A. Martone,S. Sireci. Evaluating Alignment between Curriculum,As- sessment,and Instruction[J]. Review of Educational Research,2009,79(4) : 1332-1361.
  • 7Achieve Inc. An Alignment Analysis of Washington State's College Readiness Mathemat- ics Standards with Various Local Placement Tests. Washington,DC : Achieve Inc,2006.
  • 8A. Porter,J. Smithson. Defining,Developing,and Using Curriculum Indicators. (CPRE Research Report Series No. RR--O48)[R ]. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2001.
  • 9A. Porter,M. Polikoff,T. Zeidner,J. Smithson. The Quality of Content Analysis of State Stu- dent Achievement Tests and Content Standards [J]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2008,27(4) : 2-14.
  • 10R. Blank,A. Porter, J. Smithson. New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics and Science[M ]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Omcers, 2001.

同被引文献945

二级引证文献723

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部