摘要
庄子主张通过体悟道而回归自然本真状态。任何现实、具体的技艺操作都会使道亏损,背离本真状态。技艺的积累不能升华至道,体道过程与艺术训练过程不一致,得道之境界与艺术精神也不能简单遇合。用庖丁之"技"对应无为之"道",并非正解。所以须准确把握"技"、"道"之关系,以准确定位庄子在中国古代美学思想史上的地位与价值。
Zhuangzi contended that experiencing Dao could return the true state of nature. Any realistic and specific technique operation will make Dao defective and deviate from the true state. Technique accumulation can't ascend to Dao. The process of experience Dao and art training process are inconsistent.Dao can't joint with art spirit simply. Ingenious technique corresponds to Dao. We must analyse the relationship between technique and Dao correctly. Based on this,we could figure out the value of Zhuangzi's idear in Chinese aesthetic history.
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期217-221,共5页
Hebei Academic Journal
关键词
庄子
技
道
庖丁之“技”
艺术精神
Zhuangzi
Technique
Dao
Ingenious technique
Art spirit
