利益魔咒下法律正义的虚假本体——重读马克思的《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》

False Noumenon of Law Justice in the Context of Interest Malediction: Rereading of Marx's The Argument about Act of Wood Steal

《关于林木盗窃法的辩论》是青年马克思思想"在途中"的过渡性与转折性文本,再现其历史构境和叙事逻辑,无论是思想史意义还是现实功效上,都不乏必要性所在。有关林木盗窃"罪名"背后的非道德性之深究、政治权威沦为私利的奴仆的国家本质颠倒性之揭示,以及立法者本身的不法症候之剖析,当系文本之命意所趋,也是马克思日后破灭古典自由主义价值悬设,走向本真的历史深处和现实大地的始源地。同时文中还就马克思未加说明的"物质利益发表意见的难事"之细节做了具体说明,对列宁的"转变说"做了辩证分析,并从本体论、方法论和价值论三重视角指认出该文本意义所在。

The Argument about Act of Steal Wood is a transition text of youth Marx' thought 'on the way '.Reappearance its historic condition and narrate logic is necessary for significances of thought history and realistic functions. Seeking immoral behind Steal Wood'imputation',opening out reversal of nation essence with self-interest and vassal and taking apart illegitimacy symptom of lawmaker were not only a intention trend in the article but also a value assume and an origin that Marx overturned classic liberalism later and made for the true historic depth and realistic mother earth. Also in this paper also Marx unannotated 'material benefit to express an opinion on the difficult'details were explained in detail,to Lenin's'change 'to do the dialectical analysis,and from ontology,methodology and value theory of triple perspective to identify the text meaning.