期刊文献+

地下空间安全评价方法综述 被引量:6

RESEARCH SUMMARY OF SATETY ASSESSMENT METHODS OF UNDERGROUND SPACE
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对地下空间安全评价方法的的研究现状,本文综述了地下空间安全性影响指标、评价对象、安全评价方法的评价体系,并提出安全评价的难点及发展趋势。介于地下空间复杂性的特点,影响安全性指标复杂多样,评价对象分单灾种和多灾种,评价方法也不是单一确定。比较不同评价对象及使用的评价方法。介绍主要的安全评价方法,包括层次分析法、模糊综合评价、TOPSIS法、灰色关联度分析、神经网络、仿真技术,并对各评价方法进行优缺点对比。此外研究了安全评价难点和热点,对未来的发展趋势做预测。地下空间安全评价的结果具有一定的说服力,但不能唯一确定地下空间安全性。 The paper reviewed the evaluation system of underground space security impact indicators,evaluation object and safety evaluation method for research status of safety evaluation method,and proposed the difficulties and trends of the methods. Due to the complexity of underground space,the security indicators were complex and diverse,evaluation objects were divided into single-hazard and multi-hazard,the method of evaluation was not a single determined. It compared different evaluation objects and their methods. It described the main safety assessment methods,including AHP,fuzzy comprehensive evaluation,TOPSIS method,gray correlation analysis,neural networks,simulation technology,and compared the advantages and disadvantages of each evaluation method. In addition,the research studied the difficulty and hot of safety assessment,and forecasted development trend for the future. The results of safety assessment of underground space had some persuasion,but not uniquely determined the safety of underground space.
机构地区 徐州工程学院
出处 《环境工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第S1期661-668,共8页 Environmental Engineering
基金 江苏省前瞻性产学研联合创新资金项目(BY2013022) 江苏省大学生创新国家级项目(201411998017Z) 江苏省大型工程装备检测与控制重点实验室2012年开放课题(JSKLEDC201218)
关键词 地下空间 安全评价 评价体系 研究现状 发展趋势 underground space safety assessment evaluation system research status development trends
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1杨振舰.可视化数据挖掘技术在城市地下空间GIS中的应用研究[D].河北工业大学2012
  • 2曹亮.城市地下空间开发的地质环境识别评价与建模研究[D].南京大学2012
  • 3肖新平,宋中民,李峰.灰技术基础及其应用[M]科学出版社,2005.
  • 4童林旭著.地下空间与城市现代化发展[M]. 中国建筑工业出版社, 2005
  • 5Satar Mahdevari,Kourosh Shahriar,Akbar Esfahanipour.Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS[J]. Science of the Total Environment . 2014
  • 6Lorenzo Barbato,Furio Cascetta,Marilena Musto,Giuseppe Rotondo.Fire safety investigation for road tunnel ventilation systems - an overview[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research . 2014
  • 7J.C. Li,H.B. Li,G.W. Ma,Y.X. Zhou.Assessment of underground tunnel stability to adjacent tunnel explosion[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research . 2012
  • 8Fan Yang,Xinming Qian,Ping Huang.Fire Safety Assessment of Underground Buildings based on Grey Relational Analysis[J]. Procedia Engineering . 2012
  • 9Yong Yao,Jiangshi Zhang,Jia Tao,Panpan He,Shushan Gao.Safety Problems in Crowded Underground Space in Beijing[J]. Procedia Engineering . 2012
  • 10Ying-Ming Wang,Taha M.S. Elhag.Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment[J]. Expert Systems With Applications . 2005 (2)

共引文献5

同被引文献178

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部