对高校自主招生雷人考题的讨论

Discussion on the Amazing and Erratic Questions in University’s Autonomous Errollment

雷人考题的支持者认为,面试题目越"雷人",越引起媒体和公众的关注和讨论,在一定意义上说明题目出得好;对考生来讲,有利于才智的发挥;对考官来讲,有利于发现考生的亮点和不足并据此打分。还有更重要的一点,这种考试方式对我们教育模式有良性的引导。反对者则认为,以"脑筋急转弯"的方式来选拔学生,这其实是走入了另外一个极端;我们不能因为高考的题目过于严肃,就认为"无厘头"的题目可以让大众"眼前一亮";部分教授的试题雷人,说明这"第一课"上得不好,作为重点高校,应该引以为耻,而现在反而拿到社会上大炒特炒,实在是"香臭不分"。

There are two opposite opinions towards the strange and unthinkable questions for interviews in universities’ autonomous errollment:one party holds that the fancy and novel questions in the interviews are very good because they are a kind of brain games for the candidates,and kind of positive trial for the education reform in China.However,the others think differently about the amazing or astonishing questions in the interview.They suppose that such kind of riddles for interview is not necessarily favorable substitutes for the standard Gaokao test items which still play an indispensable role in current China.What’s more,as an introductory class for the candidates by the professors,the interview should not be unimaginable or erratic.Instead,the professors as the interviewees should represent the elite of China and make out some serious and representative test items for the interviews.