期刊文献+

不同煤种对烟气中汞的形态和分布的影响 被引量:6

Effects of different kinds of coal on the morphology and distribution of mercury in flue gases
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用化学热平衡分析方法研究了不同煤种燃烧过程中汞元素的化学形态及其分布.选用的煤种为唐山烟煤、高平无烟煤、贵州六盘水贫煤、小龙潭褐煤、印尼褐煤及宜昌褐煤6个煤样,在50~700℃温度范围内,比较讨论了不同煤样在氧化性气氛中汞的化学形态和物理相.结果表明:烟气温度较低时,原煤中S元素含量对烟气中汞的形态和分布的影响占主导地位;而原煤中Cl-含量越多,低温时最容易实现从HgSO4到HgCl2的转化,高温时最难实现从HgCl2到单质Hg的转化;相对于其它煤种,S和Cl元素在褐煤燃烧过程中的这种影响相对弱些. The chemical morphology and distribution of Hg during different coal combustion processes are examined based on the chemical thermal equilibrium analysis. The selected raw coals include Tangshan bituminous coal,Gaoping anthracite coal,Liupanshui lean coal,Xiaolongtan lignite coal,Indonesia lignite coal,and Yichang lignite coal. The chemical morphology and physical phase of Hg are compared under the oxidizing atmosphere in a temperature range of 50 ~ 700 ℃. The results show that the speciation and distribution of Hg are closely related to coal type and the content of S in coal when temperature is low. The higher content of Cl in coal is,the longer the existence interval of HgCl2in flue gas will be. It is easier to transform HgSO4to HgCl2in low temperature but it is more difficult to transform HgCl2to Hg in high temperature. The morphology and distribution of mercury are clearly influenced by S and Cl elements in the flue gas of coal combustion process,which is relatively weak for lignite coal.
出处 《环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1567-1571,共5页 Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项基金(No.20100141120024) 华中科技大学煤燃烧国家重点实验室开放基金(No.FSKLCC1004) 广东省部产学研结合项目(No.2012B091000166)~~
关键词 煤种 氯离子 形态 氧化 mercury type of coal chlorine morphology oxidation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献71

共引文献351

同被引文献93

  • 1高洪亮,周劲松,骆仲泱,午旭杰,胡长兴,倪明江,岑可法.NO对燃煤烟气中汞形态分布影响的实验研究[J].工程热物理学报,2004,25(6):1057-1060. 被引量:14
  • 2郭欣,郑楚光,陈丹.300MW煤粉锅炉砷排放特征的实验研究[J].环境科学,2006,27(4):631-634. 被引量:33
  • 3徐友宁,陈社斌,陈华清,袁汉春.大柳塔煤矿开发土壤重金属污染响应研究[J].中国矿业,2007,16(7):47-50. 被引量:31
  • 4国家环境保护局,中国环境监测总站.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990:329-458.
  • 5郑刘根,刘桂建,齐翠翠,陈怡伟,张莹.中国煤中汞的环境地球化学研究[J].中国科学技术大学学报,2007,37(8):953-963. 被引量:40
  • 6Yenilmez F, Kuter N, Emil M K, et al. Evaluation of pollution levels at an abandoned coal mine site in turkey with the aid of G1S[ J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 86 ( l ) : 12-19.
  • 7Candeias C, Melo R, Avila P F, et al. Heavy metal pollution in mine-soil-plant system in S. Franciseo de Assis - panasqueira mine (Portugal) [.1]. Applied Geochemistry, 2014, 44 : 12-26.
  • 8Chehregani A, Noori M, Yazdi 14 L. Phytoremediation of heavy- metal-polluted soils: screening for new accumulator plants in Angouran mine (Iran) and evaluation of removal ability [ J ]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2009, 72 (5) : 1349-1353.
  • 9Teixeira E, Ortiz L, Aires M, et al. Distribution of selected heavy metals in fluvial sediments of the coal mining region of Baixo Jacu~, RS, Brazil[ J ]. Environmental Geology, 2001, 41 (1-2) : 145-154.
  • 10Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control, a sedimentological approach [J].Water Research, 1980, 14(8) : 975-1001.

引证文献6

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部