期刊文献+

分班测验中阅读理解测验的诊断性评价研究 被引量:4

On Diagnostic Assessment of Reading Comprehension in a Placement Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究运用规则空间模型对某大学长期班入学分班测验中的阅读理解测验进行诊断性评价研究,分析了由30道选择题构成的阅读理解测验和558名被试的作答反应,并将约91%的被试成功归入36种典型试题反应组型中。本研究为学生提供了关于自身学习状况更清晰和有效的诊断信息,提高了分班制度的有效性。 This research employs the Rule Space Model(RSM) in its study on the diagnostic assessment of the reading comprehension section of a university entrance placement test. It makes an analysis of the reading comprehension test, composed of 30 multiple-choice questions, and of the responses from 558 examinees, 91% of whom are successfully grouped into the 36 typical types of test responses. This research provides test candidates with a clearer and more effective diagnosis of their own learning status and improves the efficiency of the placement system.
出处 《国际汉语教学研究》 2014年第2期70-75,共6页 Journal of International Chinese Teaching
关键词 分班测验 阅读理解 规则空间模型 诊断性评价 placement test reading comprehension Rule Space Model(RSM) diagnostic assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献33

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 3刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:51
  • 4TATSUOKA K K, CORTER E J, TATSUOKA C. Patterns of diagnosed mathematical content and process skills in TIMSS-R across a sample of 20 countries [J]. American Educational Research Journal, 2004. 41 ( 4 ): 901 -926.
  • 5HARTZ S M. A bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: blending theory with practice [D]. Chicago: University of Illinois, 2002, 20-23.
  • 6WILLS M, MILLER E, CHANG H. Complemental diagnostic testing in large-scale assessment [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2005, 12 ( 1 ): 207-221.
  • 7JUNKER B W, SIJTSMA K. Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory [J]. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2001, 25 ( 3 ): 258 - 272.
  • 8TEMPLIN J, HENSON R. Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models [J]. Psychological Methods, 2006, 11 (3): 287-305:
  • 9TORRE D J, DOUGLAS A J. Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis [J]. Psychometrika, 2004, 23 ( 3 ): 333 - 353.
  • 10RUPP A A. TEMPLIN J. The effects of Q-Matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model [J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2007. 16 ( 1 ): 1 - 18.

共引文献10

同被引文献25

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部