期刊文献+

Aerodynamic optimization of rotor airfoil based on multi-layer hierarchical constraint method 被引量:7

Aerodynamic optimization of rotor airfoil based on multi-layer hierarchical constraint method
原文传递
导出
摘要 Rotor airfoil design is investigated in this paper. There are many difficulties for this highdimensional multi-objective problem when traditional multi-objective optimization methods are used. Therefore, a multi-layer hierarchical constraint method is proposed by coupling principal component analysis(PCA) dimensionality reduction and e-constraint method to translate the original high-dimensional problem into a bi-objective problem. This paper selects the main design objectives by conducting PCA to the preliminary solution of original problem with consideration of the priority of design objectives. According to the e-constraint method, the design model is established by treating the two top-ranking design goals as objective and others as variable constraints. A series of bi-objective Pareto curves will be obtained by changing the variable constraints, and the favorable solution can be obtained by analyzing Pareto curve spectrum. This method is applied to the rotor airfoil design and makes great improvement in aerodynamic performance. It is shown that the method is convenient and efficient, beyond which, it facilitates decision-making of the highdimensional multi-objective engineering problem. Rotor airfoil design is investigated in this paper. There are many difficulties for this highdimensional multi-objective problem when traditional multi-objective optimization methods are used. Therefore, a multi-layer hierarchical constraint method is proposed by coupling principal component analysis(PCA) dimensionality reduction and e-constraint method to translate the original high-dimensional problem into a bi-objective problem. This paper selects the main design objectives by conducting PCA to the preliminary solution of original problem with consideration of the priority of design objectives. According to the e-constraint method, the design model is established by treating the two top-ranking design goals as objective and others as variable constraints. A series of bi-objective Pareto curves will be obtained by changing the variable constraints, and the favorable solution can be obtained by analyzing Pareto curve spectrum. This method is applied to the rotor airfoil design and makes great improvement in aerodynamic performance. It is shown that the method is convenient and efficient, beyond which, it facilitates decision-making of the highdimensional multi-objective engineering problem.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第6期1541-1552,共12页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11402288 and 11372254) the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CB744804)
关键词 MULTI-LAYER HIERARCHICAL CONSTRAINT METHOD Multi-objective optimization NSGA II PARETO front Principal component analysis Rotor AIRFOIL Multi-layer hierarchical constraint method Multi-objective optimization NSGA II Pareto front Principal component analysis Rotor airfoil
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1Leishman J G. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics. 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 348-350.
  • 2Dadone L U. Design and analytical study of a rotor airfoil. NASA CR-2988, 1978.
  • 3Yamauchi G K, Johnson W. Trends of Reynolds number effects on two-dimensional airfoil characteristics {or heli- copter rotor analyses. NASA TM-84363, 1983.
  • 4Hassan A A, Charles B D. Airfoil design for helicopter rotor blades-a three-dimensional approach. Journal of Air- craft, 1997, 34(2) : 197-205.
  • 5Ranjan G L, Chopra I. Multi-objective optimization of a composite helicoper rotor. AIAA-1994-1420,1994.
  • 6Spalart P R, Allmaras S R. A one equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA-1992-39, 1992.
  • 7Hicks R M, Henne P A. Wing design by numerical opti- mization. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(7).. 407-413.
  • 8Sobieczky H. Parametric airfoils and wings, recent devel- opment of aerodynamic design methodologies inverse de- sign and optimization. Braunschweig Wiesbaden, Germa- ny, Friedr: Vieweg : Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH,1999:72-74.
  • 9Lepine J, Guibault F, Trepanier, et al. Optimized nonu- ni{orm rational B-spline geometrical representation for aero- dynamic design of wings. AIAA Journal, 2001 : 39 (11) : 2033-2041.
  • 10Giunta A A, Wojtkiewicz S F, Eldred M S, et al. Over- view of modern design of experiments methods for compu- tational simulations. AIAA-2003-649, 2003.

共引文献42

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部