期刊文献+

反讽回应话语的性别差异研究——以《傲慢与偏见》为例

Research on the Gender Difference in the Response of the Ironic Discourse——Taking Pride and Prejudice for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反讽话语作为一种交际手段在跨文化交际中扮演重要的角色。Sperber和Wilson认为,反讽话语在本质上是回应的,并据此提出了反讽回应理论。以该理论为框架,比较分析男女性在反讽话语使用过程中目标对象、表达方式及语用策略三方面的差异,旨在为跨文化交际学和语用学的跨学科研究做出有益尝试。 The ironic discourse,as a method of communication,plays an important role in intercultural communication. Sperber and Wilson believe that the ironic discourse in nature is to respond and proposes the irony response theory accordingly. Based on this theory,this paper compares and analyzes the differences of ironic discourse use between males and females in target,expression method and pragmatic strategy in order to benefit the interdisciplinary research on intercultural communication and pragmatics.
作者 杨红
出处 《黑龙江教育学院学报》 2014年第11期128-132,共5页 Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education
基金 2013年黑龙江省高等教育教学改革工程项目<〈跨文化交际〉课程体系构建中"文化自觉"理念导入研究>的阶段性成果(JG2013010211) 2014年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助(HEUCF141208)
关键词 反讽话语 跨文化交际 回应 性别差异 ironic discourse intercultural communication response gender difference
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

  • 1涂靖.反讽的语用特征和限制条件[J].外语学刊,2002(1):77-81. 被引量:21
  • 2Barbe, K. Irony in Context [ M]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995.
  • 3Cutler, A. Beyond parsing and lexical look-up: An enriched description of auditory sentence comprehension [ A ]. In R. Wales & W. Walker (Eds.) New Approaches to Language Mechanisms [ C ]. Amsterdam: Norton-Holland, 1976 : 133 - 49.
  • 4Dews, S. & Winner, E. Muting the meaning: A social function of irony [ J ]. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1995, 10(1) :3 - 19.
  • 5Glucksberg, S. Commenting on nonliteral language: Processing and use[ J]. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity,1995, 10(1) :47 -57.
  • 6Leech, G. & Short, M. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose [ M ]. London : Longman, 1981.
  • 7Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[ M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986/1995.
  • 8Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi [ A]. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications [ C ]. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 1998:284 - 294.
  • 9Yus, F. On reaching the intended ironic interpretation [ J ]. International Journal of Communication,2000,10( 1 -2 ) :27 -78.
  • 10朱虹.奥斯丁研究[M].北京:中国文联出版公司,1985..

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部