期刊文献+

宏观基本图稳定性评价方法及在子区划分的应用 被引量:2

Method of sub-region division based on macroscopic fundamental diagram
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出宏观基本图稳定性的评价方法及指标,对MFD进行了特征分析,定义三个特征参数:路网运行最大加权平均交通量、路网运行临界加权平均交通量、路网运行临界运行车辆数;通过特征分析提出基于MFD的交通状态划分方法,划分为顺畅、临界、拥堵等三种交通状态;着重讨论临界状态的交通特征,提出利用临界状态的路网加权平均交通量作为路网交通运行离散度来评价MFD的稳定性。在子区划分的应用中,通过考察不同子区数量下的全路网交通运行离散度,得到最优的路网路网子区数量及相应的划分方案。最后,在微观交通仿真平台上,通过对现实路网的交通运行历史数据进行模拟,在广州市海珠区江南片区给出实例分析。把路网总长度为约25 km,覆盖范围约4 km2的路网划分为两个子区,为交通管理决策提供支持。 Then the evaluation method of the sub - area division is put forward. Three characteristic parameters are defined to grasp thecharacteristics of the MFDs,including network maximum weighted average flow,network critical weighted average flow,and networkcritical running vehicles. The traffic state division method based on MFD is also achieved to divide the state into three situations:smooth,critical and congestion. For the critical state,the MFD’s stability is quantitative analyzed by the dispersion of network weightedaverage flow during the critical state. After the sub - area division of the network,the MFD’s stability is used to evaluate theeffect of the division to get the optimization division of the network. At last,the application is put forward in the downtown of HaizhuDistrict,Guangzhou. The total length of the links in the area is 25km,covering a square of 4km2. The area is divided into two sub -areas,supporting the traffic management.
作者 沙志仁 谢海莹 戴秀斌 SHA Zh-ren;XIE Hai-ying;DAI Xiu-bin(Guangdong Fundway Science and Techonology Co. ,Ltd. ,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510006,China)
出处 《黑龙江交通科技》 2019年第1期169-172,共4页 Communications Science and Technology Heilongjiang
基金 2017B010111007广东省科技项目
关键词 宏观基本图 子区划分 交通仿真 MFD Sub - area division Traffic simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献50

  • 1马莹莹.面向交通小区的交通控制策略研究[D].同济大学,2010.
  • 2DAGANZO C F. Urban gridlock: Macroscopic model- ing and mitigation approaches[J]. Transportation Re- search Part B: Methodological, 2007,41 (1) : 49-62.
  • 3GEROLIMINIS N, DAGANZO C F. Existence of ur- ban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings [J]. Transportation Research Part B : Methodological, 2008,42 (9) : 759-770.
  • 4CASSIDY M J,JANG K, DAGANZO C F. Macro- scopic fundamental diagrams for freeway networks [J] Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011 (2) : 8-15.
  • 5GONZALES E J,CHAVIS C, LI Y, DAGANZO C F. Multimodal transport modeling for Nairobi, Ken- ya: Insights and recommendations with an evidence- based model[R]. UC Berkeley Center for Future Ur- ban Transport, 2009.
  • 6GAO F. Macroscopic fundamental diagrams for Stockholm using FCD data[D]. KTH: School of Ar- chitecture and the Built Environment (ABE),2011.
  • 7HE Z, HE S, GUAN W. Figure-eight hysteresis pat- tern in macroscopic fundamental diagrams for urban freeway network in Beijing, China[C]//Transporta- tion Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, 2013:13- 1760.
  • 8LECLERCQ L,GEROLIMINIS N. Estimating MFDs in simple networks with route choice[J]. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013,80(7) : 99-118.
  • 9GEROLIMINIS N, BOYACI B. The effect of variabil- ity of urban systems characteristics in the network capacity[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Meth- odological,2012,46(10) : 1607-1623.
  • 10XIE X,CHIABAUT N, LECLERCQ L. Macroscop- ic fundamental diagram for urban streets and mixed traffic: cross-comparison of estimation methods[C] // Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, 2013 : 103-105.

共引文献8

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部