期刊文献+

吉西他滨联合替吉奥序贯替吉奥同步放化疗与联合化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌比较观察 被引量:7

Comparison of Two Kinds of Comprehensive Treatment in the Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨吉西他滨联合替吉奥序贯替吉奥同步放化疗与联合化疗在局部晚期胰腺癌治疗中的临床疗效和安全性。方法 39例诊断明确且无法手术的局部晚期胰腺癌患者在2种综合治疗方式后的生存状况,分为A、B组,其中A组20例,B组19例,A组采用吉西他滨联合替吉奥诱导化疗后序贯同步放化疗,以替吉奥为同步化疗药物;B组采用吉西他滨与替吉奥联合化疗。采用有效率、疾病控制率、临床受益反应来评价近期疗效;远期随访以无进展生存期和总生存期为观察终点,并对药物的安全性进行评估。结果 A组可评估患者16例,B组15例。在完成周期治疗的患者中,A组有效率、疾病控制率均优于B组(分别为31.2%vs 26.7%,81.3%vs 73.3%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.015、0.047)。A组患者总的临床受益反应率高于B组(80.6%vs 72.4%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.035);A组的疼痛评分降低及疼痛改善持续时间明显优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组体质量增加及KPS评分升高差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组的中位无进展生存期和中位总生存期均略高于B组(5.8个月vs 4.9个月,16.1个月vs 15.3个月),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.423、0.348)。A组的1 a生存率(70.2%)略高于B组(67.9%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.315)。在血液学毒性反应方面,A组发生率低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在胃肠道反应及肝、肾功能不全方面,A组与B组差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论吉西他滨联合替吉奥序贯替吉奥同步放化疗较联合化疗在肿瘤局部控制及疼痛控制方面上更优,但2种综合治疗在提高患者的生存方面效果相近;2种综合治疗的毒副反应均可耐受,其中吉西他滨联合替吉奥序贯替吉奥同步放化疗较联合化疗的血液学毒性稍低。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of two comprehensive programs in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were divided into the two groups. 20( group A) received gemcitabine and S-1 combined with synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy,19( group B) received gemcitabine and S-1. Results The response rate and disease control rate of the group A were higher than the group B( 31. 2% vs 26. 7%,81. 3% vs 73. 3%),which remained statistically significant( P = 0. 015,0. 047). The clinical benefit response was 80. 6% in the group A,and 72. 4% in the group B,there was significantly different in the clinical benefit response( P = 0. 035). The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival of the group A were higher than the group B( 5. 8 months vs 4. 9 months,16. 1 months vs 15. 3 months),but there were no significant difference( P = 0. 423,0. 348). The toxicities in the blood system of the group A were inferior to the group B( P < 0. 05). The others toxicities between the two groups were not significantly different( P > 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with gemcitabine and S-1,gemcitabine and S-1 combined with synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy has better disease control and pain control for locally advanced pancreatic cancer,but it can’t improve the survival rate. The toxicities in the blood system of the group A were inferior to the group B,but the others toxicities between the two groups were not significantly different.
作者 李士猛
出处 《肿瘤基础与临床》 2016年第3期216-221,共6页 journal of basic and clinical oncology
关键词 局部晚期胰腺癌 吉西他滨 替吉奥 化疗 放疗 locally advanced pancreatic cancer gemcitabine S-1 chemotherapy radiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jee Suk Chang,Michael L.C. Wang,Woong Sub Koom,Hong In Yoon,Yoonsun Chung,Si Young Song,Jinsil Seong.??High-dose Helical Tomotherapy With Concurrent Full-dose Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer(J)International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2012 (5)
  • 2Saarto T,Blomqvist C,Rissanen P,Auvinen A,Elomaa I.Haematological toxicity: a marker of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in stage II and III breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer . 1997
  • 3Louvet C,Labianca R,Hammel P, et al.Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2005
  • 4Sakamoto Junichi,Morita Satoshi,Yumiba Takeyoshi,Narahara Hiroyuki,Kinoshita Koichi,Nakane Yasushi,Imamoto Haruhiko,Shiozaki Hitoshi.A phase II clinical trial to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel in patients with ascites caused by advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma: a new concept of clinical benefit response for non-measurable type of gastric cancer. Japanese journal of clinical oncology . 2003
  • 5Gurka MK,Collins SP,Slack R,Tse G,Charabaty A,Ley L,Berzcel L,Lei S,Suy S,Haddad N,Jha R,Johnson CD,Jackson P,Marshall JL,Pishvaian MJ.Stereotactic body radiation therapy with concur-rent full-dose gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer:a pilot trial demonstrating safety. Radiotherapy and Oncology . 2013
  • 6Falavigna M,Lima KM,Giacomazzi J,et al.Effects of lifestyle modification after breast cancer treatment:a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev . 2014
  • 7Burris HA,Moore MJ,Andersen J,et al.Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 1997
  • 8Massimo Di Maio,Cesare Gridelli,Ciro Gallo,Frances Shepherd,Franco Vito Piantedosi,Silvio Cigolari,Luigi Manzione,Alfonso Illiano,Santi Barbera,Sergio Federico Robbiati,Luciano Frontini,Elena Piazza,Giovanni Pietro Ianniello,Enzo Veltri,Federico Castiglione,Francesco Rosetti,Vittorio Gebbia,Lesley Seymour,Paolo Chiodini,Francesco Perrone.Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treatment efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomised trials[J].Lancet Oncology.2005(9)
  • 9贾林,袁世珍.胰腺癌化疗新指标——临床受益疗效及其应用[J].医学综述,2002,8(5):304-305. 被引量:24

二级参考文献2

共引文献24

同被引文献64

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部