期刊文献+

埋伏阻生齿微创拔除方法 被引量:7

Minimally Invasive Extraction of Embedded or Impacted Teeth
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的初步研究埋伏牙和阻生牙的微创拔除方法及技巧。方法选择口腔门诊和住院的埋伏阻生牙患者180例,其中上颌第三磨牙埋伏阻生11例、上颌埋伏尖牙阻生26例、上颌埋伏多生牙13例、下颌埋伏多生牙14例、下颌第三磨牙埋伏阻生116例(又随机分为微创拔牙A组58例和对照的传统拔牙B组58例)。排除拔牙禁忌症,术前拍摄全颌曲面断层片或牙科锥束CT,评估患牙位置及其与毗邻重要解剖结构(牙和神经等)的位置关系,设计牙龈翻瓣,上下颌埋伏牙和下颌智齿的A组利用仰角机头等微创拔牙器械与技术拔除,B组采用传统劈冠法拔除。记录术中及术后患者主观感受、手术并发症发生率等,评估微创拔牙技术的临床效果。结果埋伏阻生牙用微创拔牙器械和技术,极大限度地降低了埋伏阻生牙的拔除难度,并且拔牙时间可预测和可控制,耗时5~35 min,平均为15 min。与传统拔牙方法对比,患者主观牙科畏惧感和术后不良反应如术区肿胀疼痛、张口受限、下唇麻木、干槽症等发生率明显较低,无一例严重并发症发生。结论通过微创拔牙方法可拔除各类埋伏阻生牙,手术时间可控制、可预测,并发症少,反应轻,是一种值得在临床上推广普及的技术。 Objective To study the methods and techniques of minimally invasive extraction of embedded or impacted teeth.Methods One hundred and eighty embedded or impacted teeth were involved in this study,including11 maxillary wisdom teeth,26 maxillary embedded canine,13 maxillary supernumerary teeth,14 mandibular supernumerary teeth and 116 mandibular wisdom teeth(randomly divided to group A and group B).All the patients with extraction contraindications were excluded.Preoperative panoramic X-ray or cone beam CT was executed to locate the impacted teeth and the relationship between impacted teeth and adjacent anatomical structures.Then over the gingival flap was cut and turned,and the impacted teeth using minimal invasive apparatus was extracted.The operation time,intraoperative and postoperative patient′s feeling and complications were recorded to assess the effect of minimally invasive extraction.Results Almost all the impacted teeth could be extracted by minimally invasive techniques.The operation time was divinable and controllable,which lasted from5 to 35 minutes with the mean 15 minutes.Compared with the traditional extraction,the patients maintained good comfort during operation.The intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence,such as swelling,pain,limitation of mouth opening,numbness of lower lip and dry socket,was significantly lower.None had serious reactions.Conclusions It is possible and effective to extract all kinds of embedded or impacted teeth by minimal invasive extraction methods.The extraction time is divinable and controllable.The complications and reaction are light.This technique is worthy of popularizing.
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第2期118-120,共3页 Military Medical Journal of South China
关键词 埋伏牙 阻生牙 微创拔牙 Embedded teeth Impacted teeth Minimally invasive extraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1胡开进,孔亮,彭莲,王新木,秦瑞峰,周宏志,杨立峰.口腔组织补片置入拔牙创预防术后并发症[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(2):214-216. 被引量:19
  • 2郑杰,胡祥文,尤欣,陈红,刘慧敏.影响老龄患者拔牙安全性的多因素分析[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2006,4(2):96-98. 被引量:21
  • 3张雪洋,胡飞,朱安棣,余燕玲.Luxator微创拔牙刀的临床研究[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(2):20-22. 被引量:22
  • 4李涛,江莉婷,陈玉华,高月丽,王彩娣,孙琳.两种手术径路在水平阻生牙拔除中的选择[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2007,17(2):149-152. 被引量:13
  • 5Susarla SM. Dodson TB. How well do clinicans estimate third molar extraction difficulty [ J ] ? J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,63 ( 2 ) : 191 - 199.
  • 6Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, et al. Experience versus complication rate in third molar surgery[ J]. Head Face Med, 2006, 2 : 14.
  • 7Kilpatrick HC. Removal of impacted third molars utilizing speeds up to 200,000 r/min[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1958, 11(4):364-369.
  • 8Karaca I, Simsek S, Ugar D, et al. Review of flap design influence on the health of the periodontium after mandibular third molar surgery [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 104( 1 ) :18 -23.
  • 9Ren YF, Malmstrom HS. Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(10) :1909 - 1021.
  • 10Peterson LJ. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [ M ]. 4th ed. New York : Elsevier Mosby,2003 : 184 - 214.

共引文献260

同被引文献43

  • 1Erdogan O, Tath U, UstiJn Y, et al.Influence of two different {iap designs on the sequelae of mandibular third molar surgery[J].l O- ral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,15 (3) : 147-152.
  • 2McNeil DW, Helfer AJ, Weaver BD, et a/.Memory of pain andanxiety associated with tooth extraction[J]. J Dent Res, 2011,90 (2) :220-224.
  • 3L6pez-Jornet P,Camacho Alonso F,Sanchez-Siles M. Assessment of general pre and postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing tooth extraction: a prospective study[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2014,52(1 ) : 18-23.
  • 4Gagliardi DI,Slade GD,Sanders AE.Impact of dental care on oral health-related quality of life and treatment goals among elderly a dults[J].Aust Dent J, 2008,53 ( 1 ) :26 -33.
  • 5Reed R, Broder HL, Jenkins G, et al. Oral health promotion a- mong older persons and their care providers in a nursing home fa- cility[J].Gerodontology,2006,23(2):73 -78.
  • 6Tavarez RR, Dos Reis WL, Rocha AT,et al. Atraumatic extrac tion and immediate implant installation: The importance of main- taining the contour gingival tissues[J].J Int Oral Health, 2013,5 (6):113-118.
  • 7Yalcin S, Aktas I, Emes Y, et al. A technique for atraumatic ex- traction of teeth before immediate implant placement using im- plant drills[J]. Implant Dent, 2009 , 18(6) :464-472.
  • 8李玉娟,丁红忠.牙挺冲击法在拔牙术中的应用[J].中国当代医药,2009,16(5):135-135. 被引量:2
  • 9李文超,阮宁.2种方法在下颌水平阻生第三磨牙拔除中的比较[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2010,28(1):71-73. 被引量:15
  • 10孙仁义,方平娟,肖进,刘登峰,徐兴侨,胡荣党.分根法与去近中阻力法拔除下颌阻生牙的比较[J].上海口腔医学,2012,21(3):344-349. 被引量:5

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部