期刊文献+

权益意识、利弊感知与隐私保护——兼议对我国社会信用建设的启示 被引量:3

On the Consciousness of Rights and Interests, Perception of Pros and Cons,and Privacy Protection: Lessons for China’s Social Credit Construction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信息共享与隐私保护的平衡是大数据时代的核心问题之一。通过问卷调查获取数据,以容忍程度为中介变量,建立SEM模型,验证权益意识、利弊感知对个人隐私保护的影响。研究表明:个人的容忍程度与其隐私保护呈现显著负相关,而对个人的权益意识、利弊感知的中介作用显著;权益意识对隐私保护的直接和间接作用均显著;个人的利处感知对隐私保护的直接和间接作用都显著,且路径系数较大;但个人的弊处感知对隐私保护的直接和间接影响均不显著。这一研究对于从个人角度加强隐私保护、推进社会信用建设有重要的借鉴意义。 The balance between information sharing and privacy protection is the core issue of the big data era.Obtaining data through questionnaires and taking tolerance level as the intermediary variable,this article constructs structural equation modelling(SEM)to verify the impact of the consciousness of rights and interests,and the perception of pros and cons on personal privacy protection.The study demonstrates the following conclusions:there is significant negative correlation between individual tolerance level and privacy protection,but the tolerance level has a remarkable intermediate effect on individual consciousness of rights and interests and perception of pros and cons;this consciousness has significant direct and indirect impact on privacy protection;individual perception of pros have outstanding effect on privacy protection,and the path coefficient is relatively large;the individual perception of cons does not demonstrate significant direct and indirect effect on privacy protection.This study provides significant references for strengthening privacy protection from individual perspective and promoting the social credit construction.
作者 耿得科 王欢 赵迷 彭淼 Geng Deke;Wang Huan;Zhao Mi;Peng Miao(School of Economics,Henan University,Kaifeng 475000,Henan,China)
出处 《征信》 北大核心 2019年第7期19-25,共7页 Credit Reference
关键词 隐私保护 权益意识 容忍程度 利弊感知 行为选择 privacy protection consciousness of rights and interests tolerance level perception of pros and cons behavior selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献180

  • 1魏明侠,肖开红.电子商务信用图章经济功能:基于中国背景样本的实验研究[J].商业经济与管理,2006(8):10-14. 被引量:8
  • 2邵兵家,孟宪强,张宗益.中国B2C电子商务中消费者信任前因的实证研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(5):143-149. 被引量:40
  • 3Milne, G.R., A.J. Rohm, and S. Bahl. Consumers Protection of Online Privacy and Identity[J]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2004, 38(2): 217-232.
  • 4Milne, G.R. and M.E. Boza. Trust and concern in consumers perceptions of marketing information management practices [J]. Journal of Interacive Marketing, 1999, 13(1): 5-24.
  • 5Anton, A.I. and J.B. Earp. A requirements taxonomy for reducing Web site privacy vulnerabilities[J]. Requirements Engineering, 2003, 19:169-185.
  • 6Earp, J.B., et al. Examining Internet Privacy Policies Within the Context of User Privacy Values[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005, 52(2): 227-237.
  • 7Rifon, N.J., R. LaRose, and S.M. Choi. Your Privacy Is Sealed: Effects of Web Privacy Seals on Trust and Personal Disclosures[J]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2005, 39(2): 339-362.
  • 8Milne, G.R. and M.J. Culnan. Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2004, 18(3): 15-29.
  • 9Hui, K.-L., H.H. Teo, and S.-Y.T. Lee. The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(1): 19-33.
  • 10Moores, T. Do consumers understand the role of privacy seals in E-Commerce[J]? Communication of the ACM, 2005, 48(3): 87- 91.

共引文献352

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部