新发现欧阳修书简与周必大、朱熹关于范仲淹神道碑铭的论争

Analysis of the Controversy between Zhou Bida and Zhu Xi over Fan Gong Shen Dao Bei Ming Based on the Newly Discovered Ou-yang Xiu's Letters

关于欧阳修《范公神道碑铭》部分文字被范纯仁任意删除一事,周必大和朱熹曾有过激烈的论争。周朱二人在主张自己的意见时论及的书简《张续帖》和《苏明允帖》,正是新发现欧阳修书简的第五十七、八十五和八十六篇。另外,周朱二人的论争此前一直被认为圆满解决了,而通过新发现欧阳修书简可以看出此论争并没有圆满解决,周必大特意主张新发现书简第五十七、八十五和八十六篇为伪作,且未收录于欧阳修全集。据此可知,通过新发现的欧阳修书简,不仅可以探寻周朱两人论争的具体轨迹,而且可以从全新的角度考察周必大编纂《欧阳文忠公集》的态度。因此,新发现的欧阳修书简意义重大。

Without permission,Fan Chunren,Fan Zhongyan's son,deleted a part of Ou-yang Xiu's Fan Gong Shen Dao Bei Ming,which later triggered a heated argument between Zhu Bida and Zhu Xi.The letters to Zhang Xu and Su Mingyun mentioned in the argument are the newly discovered Ouyang Xiu letter nos.57,85 and 86.Through the newly discovered Ou-yang Xiu's letters,we can see that the controversy between Zhou Bida and Zhu Xi which was thought to have been successfully resolved is still unsolved,as Zhou Bida claimed that the newly discovered letter nos.57,85 and 86 were counterfeits and did not take them into Ou-yang Xiu's collected works.The newly discovered Ou-yang Xiu's letters can help us explore the details of the argument between Zhou Bida and Zhu Xi;and moreover,with them,we can study the attitude of Zhou Bida compiling The Collections of Ou-yang Wenzhong from a new perspective.Therefore,they are of great importance and value.