摘要
从立法和逻辑两个层面分析得出我国界定非法口供的一个核心要素是获得口供的方式是否给被讯问人造成难以承受的痛苦,故因此将该要素认定为"痛苦规则"。文章将痛苦规则与相关的自白任意性规则进行比较区分,论证为何我国界定非法口供选择的是痛苦规则,并思考如何定量"痛苦"。
Analysis from the aspects of legislation and the logic indicates that the core element to define illegal confession is determined whether the ways of obtaining confessions have caused unbearable pain to the suspect. As a result, the element is defined as "pain rules". This paper compares "pain rules" with the relevant confession arbitrary rules, arguing why China’s definition of illegal confession choice is the "pain rules" and how to quantify the pain.
出处
《湖南涉外经济学院学报》
2015年第3期81-84,共4页
Journal of Hunan International Economics University
关键词
非法口供
痛苦规则
定量
illegal confession
pain rules
quantify