期刊文献+

前列腺影像报告和数据系统联合表观扩散系数图像定量分析对外周带前列腺癌的诊断价值 被引量:6

Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system with the apparent diffusion coefficient map for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨第2版前列腺影像报告和数据系统(prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2,PI-RADS V2评分联合表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)图像定量参数对外周带前列腺癌的诊断价值。方法:回顾性搜集50例前列腺多参数磁共振成像(multiparametric MRI,mpMRI)检查提示存在外周带结节的患者,且均经穿刺活检获得病理诊断。由两名高年资影像科医师根据PI-RADS V2标准对病灶进行定位及评分,分别利用后处理软件在ADC图像上分析、计算对应病灶区的12种ADC图像定量参数。根据病理结果将病灶分为癌灶组和良性病灶组。比较两组病灶各ADC定量参数的差异,对组间差异有统计学意义的参数采用逻辑回归逐步法拟合建模,通过受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线和决策曲线分析(decision curve analysis,DCA)评价不同方法的诊断效能和临床受益。结果:最终共获得外周带癌灶28个、良性病灶25个。PI-RADS V2评分、ADC模型及联合模型(PI-RADS V2评分+ADC模型)区分外周带癌灶和良性病灶的ROC曲线下面积、敏感度、特异度分别为0.803,60.71%,92.00%;0.857,89.29%,76.00%;0.891,71.43%,92.00%,联合模型较PI-RADS V2评分的诊断效能有明显提升(P=0.012),且在阈概率0.05~0.27和0.46~0.81范围内该联合模型具有相对最佳的总体净受益率,优于PI-RADS V2评分。结论:PI-RADS V2联合ADC图像定量分析能显著提高其区分外周带前列腺癌和良性病变的诊断效能,并改善临床受益。 Objective:To explore the value of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2(PI-RADSV2)combined with quantitative parameters derived from apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)map in the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.Methods:A total of 50 patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI(mpMRI)with suspicious peripheral nodules were retrospectively enrolled,and all patients were biopsy-proven histologically.Two radiologists analyzed the position and category of peripheral zone lesions based on PI-RADS V2.Then 12 ADC quantitative parameters were calculated regarding each lesion on the ADC map by post-processing software.The lesions were divided into malignant group and benign group according to histopathological findings.The ADC quantitative parameters between groups were compared,and stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to build a discriminative model.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve and decision curve analysis(DCA)were performed to evaluate the diagnostic power and clinical benefit.Results:Twenty-eight peripheral zone prostate malignant lesions and 25 benign lesions were obtained finally.The area under the ROC curve,sensitivity and specificity to differentiate peripheral zone prostate malignant from benign lesions were as follows:0.803,60.71%,92.00%(PI-RADS V2 score),0.857,89.29%,76.00%(ADC model),and 0.891,71.43%,92.00%(combined model),respectively.The discriminative power of the combined model was significantly improved compared with PI-RADS V2 score(P=0.012).The combined model had relatively optimal overall net benefit,which outperformed the PI-RADS V2 score when threshold probability varied in the range of 0.05–0.27 and 0.46–0.81.Conclusion:PI-RADS V2 combined with quantitative analysis of ADC map improve the power in discriminating peripheral zone prostate cancer from benign lesions,and the clinical benefit as well.
作者 冯智超 颜智敏 罗慕晴 廖云杰 容鹏飞 王维 FENG Zhichao;YAN Zhimin;LUO Muqing;LIAO Yunjie;RONG Pengfei;WANG Wei(Department of Radiology,Third Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410013,China)
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第3期277-284,共8页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(81771827) 湖南省自然科学基金(2017JJ2369)~~
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 磁共振成像 前列腺影像报告和数据系统 表观扩散系数 定量分析 prostatic neoplasm magnetic resonance imaging prostate imaging reporting and data system apparent diffusion coefficient quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献63

  • 1郭雪梅,王霄英,李飞宇,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.前列腺磁共振扩散加权成像的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(12):1858-1861. 被引量:14
  • 2任静,宦怡,赵海涛,常英娟,葛雅丽,刘燕丽,魏光全,张劲松,徐俊卿.磁共振动态增强扫描SI-T曲线对前列腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(9):1111-1114. 被引量:31
  • 3李飞宇,王霄英,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.不同年龄段正常成人前列腺外周带ADC值的初步研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(12):1496-1499. 被引量:16
  • 4李飞宇,王霄英,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.良性前列腺增生的ADC值定量分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(5):661-664. 被引量:40
  • 5Bai F, Zhang Z, Watson DR, et al. Abnormal integrity of association fiber tracts in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci, 2009,278(1-2) : 102-106.
  • 6Kingsley PB, Monahan WG. Selection of the optimum b factor for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ischerrlic stroke. Magn Reson Med, 2004,51(5):996-1001.
  • 7Bilgili Y, Unal B. Effect of region of interest on interobsetver variance in apparent diffusion coefficient measures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004,25(1) :108-111.
  • 8Mazziotta JC, Pelizzari CC, Chen GT, et al. Region of interest issues: the relationship between structure and function in the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 1991,11(2) :AS1-A56.
  • 9Higano S, Yun X, Kumabe T, et al. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis. Radiology, 2006, 241 (3) :839- 846.
  • 10Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002,16(2):196-200.

共引文献92

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部