期刊文献+

冠脉支架术后非心脏手术围手术期抗凝治疗分析 被引量:8

Assessment of Anti-Coagulative Therapy During Non-Cardiac Surgery Perioperative Period Who had Suffered Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析经皮冠状动脉介入手术治疗术后患者行非心脏外科手术围手术期抗凝策略与心脏事件的关系。方法:回顾性分析2009年1月至2014年5月在PCI术后1年内行择期非心脏手术患者56例患者的临床资料,择期手术前予低分子肝素替代治疗,术后分为继续低分子肝素抗凝组(32例)与未抗凝组(24例),观察术后心脏事件发生情况。结果:术后1周内出现急性冠脉综合症患者中,抗凝组有1例,未抗凝组有8例,两者有统计学意义。结论:近期行PCI术的患者在行择期非心脏手术围手术期合理选择抗凝治疗方案,可以明显降低围手术期心脏事件的发生率,且并不增加术后出血的风险。 Objective To analyze the relationship between anti-coagulative strategy and major adverse cardiac events during non-cardiac surgery perioperative period who had suffered percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods The clinical data of 56 patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery after coronary stenting were analyzed. These patients were administrated with low molecular weight heparin peplacement treatment before scheduled surgeries. After surgeries,patients were divided into low molecular weight heparin anticoagulative therapy group( 32cases) and non-anticoagulative therapy group( 24 cases). The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events were evaluated. Results 1 developed ACS in 7days in anticoagulative therapy group and 8 developed in non-an ticoagulative therapy group,there was statistical difference among the 2 groups. Conclusion During non-cardiac surgery perioperative period,effective anticoagulative therapy administrated in the patients who have suffered PCI recently can obviously lower the incidence of major adverse cardiac events,and can be incapable of increasing risk of postoperative hemorrhage.
出处 《湖南师范大学学报(医学版)》 2014年第3期47-49,共3页 Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 抗凝药 围手术期 急性冠脉综合征 anticoagulants perioperative period acute coronary syndrome
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 2Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 3Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 4Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 5Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 6Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 7Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 8Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.
  • 9Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751.
  • 10Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation, 2011,123:2736-2747.

共引文献425

同被引文献66

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部