再论国际投资仲裁中间接征收的认定及扩大适用

Analysis of the Indirect Expropriation System from Theoretical and Empirical Perspective Based on China's Enterprises Overseas Investment Strategy

间接征收及其规制是国际投资领域的重要制度,其有效处理对投资者与东道国具有重大意义。在国际投资法领域,认定间接征收存在三个标准,即单一效果标准、单一目的标准、兼采效果和目的标准。至今,国际投资领域未对间接征收做出明确的定义,国际投资仲裁一直存在对间接征收做出扩大解释的情况。这对于在实施一带一路战略下的鼓励企业境外投资的中国来说是具有双面刃的作用。因此,进一步明确间接征收的定义,明确间接征收的认定标准对投资者与东道国之间间接征收争议的解决,尤其是结合最新案例分析间接对于中国实施的战略具有重要意义。

Indirect expropriation is an important issue in international investment law,and dealing effectively is significant for the investors and the host-state.In the field of international investment law,there are three criteria for identifying indirect expropriation,namely single-effect standard,single-purpose standard,adopting both the effectiveness and purpose of standards.So far,a clear definition of indirect expropriation has not been made in the international investment law,but the phenomenon of whichidentification of indirect expropriation hasbeen expanded exists in the international investment arbitration.This is somewhat unfavorable to the overseas investment of Chinese enterprises under the strategy of The Belt and Road under the Therefore,to further clarify the definition of indirect expropriation,it is important for China to implement the strategy of indirect expropriation between investors and host countries.Further clear definition of indirect expropriation and recognized indirect expropriationstandards are significant for the resolve of indirect expropriation dispute between the investor and the host-state.