摘要
《侵权责任法》第22条对精神损害赔偿规定了两项适用条件:(1)侵害他人人身权益;(2)造成他人严重精神损害。将精神损害赔偿的适用范围限于"侵害他人人身权益",否定了侵害财产权益所产生之精神损害的可赔偿性,忽视了侵害财产权益情形下所产生之精神损害相对于财产损害的独立性,有必要承认因财产权益之侵害而产生的精神损害具有可获赔偿之可能。精神损害赔偿请求权以"造成他人严重精神损害"为条件亦存在问题,应当关注保护不同法益类型和区分不同主观因素的需求,以"微小损害不予赔偿"作为限制条件并借鉴"动态的严重性标准"理论,为精神损害提供更完善的救济。
The article 22 of Tort Law of the People’s Republic of China stipulates two applicable conditions for the compensation of mental distress:(1) a tort to a personal right or interest of another person;(2) a serious mental distress on the victim of the tort. Limiting the scope of compensation of mental distress to the situation 'a tort to a personal right or interest of another person'negates the probability of compensation for the mental distress caused by infringement of property right or interest of another person and ignores the independence of the mental distress relative to the material damage caused by infringement of property right or interest,and it is necessary to recognize the probability of compensation for the mental distress caused by infringement of property right or interest of another person. There are also problems to require the condition of 'a serious mental distress'.We should pay attention to the needs of protecting different types of legal interests and distinguishing different subjective factors. Taking 'Trivial damage is to be disregarded'as the restrictive condition and drawing lessons from the theory of 'dynamic system theory'can provide more perfect relief for mental distress.
作者
马俊骥
MA Jun-ji(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《时代法学》
2019年第1期87-98,共12页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
精神损害
可赔偿性
适用范围
严重
mental damage
the probability of compensation
the scope of application
a serious mental distress
