期刊文献+

Global Governance: Differences on World Order and Reconciliations between China and the West

Global Governance: Differences on World Order and Reconciliations between China and the West
原文传递
导出
摘要 currently, the mainstream Western views on world order mainly include hegemony order theory, balance of power theory, world system theory, the clash of civilizations theory, and democratic peace theory. These five theories are based on conflicting order of the evil human nature assumption. After the end of the cold war, the trends of power multi-polarization, economic globalization, political democratization, social networking, and global-wide risks have increasingly become challenges to the concept of conflicting order. In this context, the significance of a harmonious order based on China traditional views has emerged. The concept of a harmonious order based on kind human nature assumption tries to discover and promote the human moral elements. In the view of harmonious order, the world order is a harmonious state of coexisting multi-actors, the relationship between main actors is friendly relationship, and the interaction between actors is mainly in the form of mutual aid and courtesy. The western frontier theoretical progress, for example, constructivism, feminism, global governance, and international ethics studies basically fit into the harmonious order logic. Simultaneously, the advantage of the harmonious order concept is reflected in its logical similarity to and its strong applicability of an "integrated order", etc. Global governance is a kind of reconciliation idea, which is based on the harmonious order concept, and its basic logic is "weak conflict logic plus strong harmony logic",the basic framework is to establish a world-wide authoritative coordination, with country-to-country relations structure emphasizing friendship from interests, seeking common ground while reserving differences, and being multi-actors deliberative democracy in the form of interaction. currently, the mainstream Western views on world order mainly include hegemony order theory, balance of power theory, world system theory, the clash of civilizations theory, and democratic peace theory. These five theories are based on conflicting order of the evil human nature assumption. After the end of the cold war, the trends of power multi-polarization, economic globalization, political democratization, social networking, and global-wide risks have increasingly become challenges to the concept of conflicting order. In this context, the significance of a harmonious order based on China traditional views has emerged. The concept of a harmonious order based on kind human nature assumption tries to discover and promote the human moral elements. In the view of harmonious order, the world order is a harmonious state of coexisting multi-actors, the relationship between main actors is friendly relationship, and the interaction between actors is mainly in the form of mutual aid and courtesy. The western frontier theoretical progress, for example, constructivism, feminism, global governance, and international ethics studies basically fit into the harmonious order logic. Simultaneously, the advantage of the harmonious order concept is reflected in its logical similarity to and its strong applicability of an "integrated order", etc. Global governance is a kind of reconciliation idea, which is based on the harmonious order concept, and its basic logic is "weak conflict logic plus strong harmony logic",the basic framework is to establish a world-wide authoritative coordination, with country-to-country relations structure emphasizing friendship from interests, seeking common ground while reserving differences, and being multi-actors deliberative democracy in the form of interaction.
作者 Gao Qiqi
出处 《Peace》 2015年第3期43-58,共16页 和平
关键词 deliberative DEMOCRACY GOVERNANCE HARMONIOUS polit deliberative democracy governance harmonious polit
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ELKE KRAHMANN.Beck and beyond: selling security in the world risk society[J]. Review of International Studies . 2010 (1)
  • 2Zeev Maoz,Bruce Russett.Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986[J]. American Political Science Review . 1993 (3)
  • 3Francis Fukuyama."Women and the Evolution of World Poli-tics,". Foreign Affairs . 1998
  • 4Charles Beitz.Political Theory and International Relations. . 1999
  • 5Daniel Naurin."Most Common When Least Important:Deliberation in the European Union Council of Ministers,". British Journal of Political Science . 2010
  • 6Stephen Van Evera."Primed for Peace:Europe after the Cold War". International Security . 1990/1991
  • 7Waltz Kenneth.Theory of international politics,1979.
  • 8Giandomenico Majone.Europe’s ‘ Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards. European Law Journal . 1998
  • 9Alexander E. Wendt.The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization . 1987
  • 10Ann J Tickner.Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. . 1992

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部