期刊文献+

计量形式主义还是问题导向主义——拉斯特论基本无用的计量经济学

Metrics Formalism or Problem-based Doctrine:Rust’s Opinion on Mostly Useless Econometrics
原文传递
导出
摘要 拉斯特发表的《基本无用的计量经济学:评估计量经济学的因果效应》一文,以因果效应的探索和验证为主线索,对理论计量经济学过于关注数理技巧、忽视解决实际问题并导致学科衰落的'计量形式主义'现象进行了有理有据的批评。同时,也通过一系列的实例,说明建立问题导向的研究范式的可行性及其在增进人类福祉中的价值。最后,提出关于如何做有用的应用经济学研究的八项建议。拉斯特的思考,对中国学界有关的实证研究的论争具有启示作用。 Mostly Useless Econometrics?Assessing the Causal Effect of Econometric Theory was published by Rust.The papertook exploration and verification of causal effect as main clue,and conducted a well-known criticism aiming to theoreticaleconometrics,over-concern mathematical skills,neglecting to solve practical problems and then leading to discipline decline,which could be concluded as Metrics Formalism.At the same time,he also illustrated feasibility and value of increasing human farewell to establish problem-oriented research paradigm through a series of examples.Finally,he presented eight recommendations on how to do useful research for applied economics.Rust’s thinking has implications for the debate on empirical study among Chinese scholars.
作者 姚王信 崔志娟 李凤美 Yao Wangxin;Cui Zhijuan;Li Fengmei
机构地区 安徽大学商学院
出处 《海派经济学》 CSSCI 2018年第4期143-157,共15页 Journal of Economics of Shanghai School
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“创新要素投资有效性评价及其与知识产权融资绩效的关系研究”(项目批准号16BGL056)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 计量经济学 方法导向 问题导向 因果效应 Econometrics Method Orientation Problem Orientation Causal Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1吴兆龙,丁晓.结构方程模型的理论、建立与应用[J].科技管理研究,2004,24(6):90-92. 被引量:66
  • 2徐勇.当前中国农村研究方法论问题的反思[J].河北学刊,2006,26(2):55-60. 被引量:61
  • 3方敏,孙影.结构方程模型应用的几个问题[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(2):184-187. 被引量:16
  • 4程开明.结构方程模型的特点及应用[J].统计与决策,2006,22(10):22-25. 被引量:141
  • 5候杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004:7.
  • 6Kaplan D. The impact of specification error on the estimation, testing, and improvement of structural equation models [J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1988, 23: 69-86.
  • 7Kaplan D. A Study of the Sampling Variability and z-Values of Parameter Estimates From Misspecified Structural Equation Models [J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1989, 24 (1): 41-57.
  • 8Tomarken, Andrew J., Waller, Niels G, Structural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions [J]. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 1: 31-65.
  • 9Bacon, Donald R. Evaluation of Cluster Analytic Approaches to Initial Model Specification [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2001, 8 (3): 397-429.
  • 10Buhi, Eric R., Goodson Patricia, Neiland, Torsten B. Structural Equation Modeling: A Primer for Health Behavior Researchers [J]. American Journal of Health Behavior, 2007, 31 (1): 74-87.

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部