期刊文献+

高效的团队是怎样炼成的?——对团队动态过程的探索 被引量:2

How Are Effective Teams Developed?——Examining the Dynamic Team Process
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文梳理了现有的有关团队过程的研究,并以此为基础考察了中国团队运行中自然浮现出来的团队互动过程及其对团队绩效的影响。我们安排102个团队参加了一个模拟团队练习,测量了这些团队的互动过程和客观绩效(即完成练习的时间)。分析结果表明,团队参与、任务分工和行动整合是三种不同的团队互动过程,它们对团队绩效都有较好的预测作用。此外,结果还表明,在团队运行的整个时间段内,三种互动过程的出现是有先后顺序的,团队参与和任务分工主要发生在团队运行初期,行动整合则发生在它们之后,而且行动整合对绩效的影响更直接。 After a thorough review of existing research on team processes,this study examined the emerged team interaction processes in self-managed teams and their influences on team performance in the Chinese context.102 teams participated in a simulated team exercise.We measured the team interaction processes and objective performance(i.e.,time used to complete the exercise).The results indicated that team participation,task division and concerted actions were three different categories of team processes,and all of them had significant effects on team performance.In addition,the results demonstrated that from the perspective of time,these three team processes emerged sequentially.Team participation and task division were salient in the early preparation phase,and conceited actions followed them.Conceited actions influenced team performance more direcdy than team preparation and task division.
作者 张志学 韩玉兰 王颂 ZHANGZhi-xue;HANYu-lan;WANG Song(Guanghua School of Management,PekingUniversity,Beijing 100871,China;School of Business,East China University of Scienceand Technology,Shanghai 200237,China)
出处 《人力资源管理评论》 2010年第1期16-30,共15页 Human Resource Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金杰出青年科学基金(70925002)
关键词 团队过程 团队互动 时间 团队绩效 Team Processes Team Interaction Time Team Performance
  • 相关文献

同被引文献36

  • 1刘雪峰,张志学.模拟情境中工作团队成员互动过程的初步研究及其测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):253-259. 被引量:26
  • 2孙爱莲.大学生课堂合作学习失效的现象分析及对策研究[J].天水师范学院学报,2007,27(1):125-128. 被引量:5
  • 3王秀丽.大学生合作学习——我国的研究现状与展望[J].高校教育管理,2007,1(4):6-10. 被引量:20
  • 4Hoegl M, Parboteeah K P. Team reflexivity in innova- tive projects[J]. R&D Management, 2006,36(2):113-125.
  • 5Mathieu J E, Schulze W. The influence of team know- ledge and formal plans on episodic team process-perfor- mance relationship[J]. Academy of Management Jour- nal, 2006,49(3):605-619.
  • 6Marks M A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(3):356-376.
  • 7Chang A, Bordia P, Duck J. Punctuated equilibrium and linear progression: Toward a new understanding of group development[J]. Academy of Management Jour- nal, 2003,46(1):106-117.
  • 8Farh J L, Lee C, Farh C I. Task conflict and team crea- tivity: A question of how much and when[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010,95(6):1173-1180.
  • 9Mathieu J E, Tannenbaum S I, Donsbach J S, et al. A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2014,40(1):126-156.
  • 10Akgti A E, Keskin H, Lyrm G, et al. Antecedents and consequences of team sense making capability in pro- duct development projects[J]. R&D Management, 2012, 42(5):473-493.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部