期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

科学理性的命运 被引量：1

The Fate of Scientific Reason
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学理性最初的基本含义很大程度是由康德和黑格尔的形而上学来规定的。科学哲学基于自然科学的理论、历史和实践对科学理性进行了反形而上学辩护。而科学社会学和社会认识论则从自然科学"之外"的视角来解构科学理性。在逻辑和历史相一致的意义上说,科学理性的命运与这样三个问题密切相关:科学理性必需形而上学吗?科学理性的自我辩护能走多远?科学理性能解构成什么? The original meaning of scientific reason is largely defined within Kant's and Hegel's metaphysics.But philosophy of science attempts to develop an antimetaphysical conception of scientific reason on the basis of the theory,history,and practice of natural science.Both sociology of science and social epistemology propose the 'outside'perspective to deconstruct scientific reason.The fate of scientific reason is associated with these questions:1.Is metaphysics indispensable for scientific reason?2.How far would the selfjustification of scientific reason go?3.What can scientific reason be deconstructed?
作者 吴畏
机构地区 湖南科技大学法学院
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第1期30-33,共4页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 湖南省社科规划课题"科学理性及其现代形式研究"(湘宣字[2000]23号B43)
关键词 科学理性 形而上学 科学哲学 科学社会学 社会认识论 scientific reason,metaphysics,philosophy of science,sociology of science,social epistemology
分类号 B08 [哲学宗教—哲学理论]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kurt Hubner. Critique of Scientific Reason [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press, 1983.4 - 7,42 -43.
  • 2Robert McRae. Kant's Conception of the Unity of the Sciences [J]. Philosophy anti Phenomenological Research. Vol. 18. No. 1(1957).1- 17.
  • 3Larry Laudan. Beyond Positivism and Relativism[M]. Colorado and Oxford: Westview Press, 1996.19,132 - 133.
  • 4Michael Polanyi. Personal Knowledge[M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.64 - 65.
  • 5Richard Rorty. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.62,39.
  • 6David J Hess. Science Studies[M]. New York and London: New York University Press, 1997.52- 53.
  • 7Robert K Merton. The Sociology of Science[M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press, 1973. 183 - 184.
  • 8Barry Barnes. T. S. Knhn and Social Science[M]. London: Macmillan, 1982. xi.
  • 9Michael Friedman. On the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and its Philosophical Agenda[J]. Studies of History and Philosophy of Science Vol. 29. No.2(1998).239 - 271.
  • 10Steve Fuller. Social Epistemology[M]. 2nd ed. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press,2002. ix-x.

同被引文献15

  • 1[2]Fritz Machlup.Are the Social Science Really Inferior?[C]//in Michael Martin and Lee C.Mclntyre(eds.)Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science.Cambridge,Massachusetts:The MIT Press.5-6.
  • 2[3]Paul K.Feyerabend.Farewell to Reason[M].Verso.1987.
  • 3[4]Patti K.Feyerabend.Three Dialogues on Knowledge[M].Blackwell.1991.
  • 4[6]Ted Benton,Ian Craib.Philosophy of Social Science[M].Hampshire:Palgrave,2001.
  • 5[7]Paul K.Feyerabend.Problems of Empifieism Philosophical Papers Vol.2[C].Cambridge University Press.1981.
  • 6[8]Jon Elster.Functional Explanation:In Social Science[C].in Michael Martin and Lee C.McIntyre(eds.)Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science.Cambridge,Massachusetts:The MIT Press.403-414.
  • 7[9]Paul X.reyerabend.Science in a Free Society[M].Verso.1978.
  • 8[10]Margaret Archer,Roy Bhaskar,Andrew Collier,Tony Lawand New York:Roufledge.1998.xi.
  • 9[11]Bjorn Wittrock,Johan Heilbron,Lars Magnusson.The Rise of Social Science and the Formation of Modernity[C] // in Johan Heilbron,Lars Magnusson and Bjoin Wittrock(eds.)The Rise of Social Science and the Formation of Modernity.Dordrecht,Boston and London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.1998.1-35.
  • 10[12](法)让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔尔.后现代状态[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.1997.

引证文献1

自然辩证法研究
2003年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部