逻辑悖论成因与解法问题研究

Research on Causes and Solutions to Logical Paradox

和"飞矢不动"一样,逻辑是有缺陷的,这就是逻辑悖论。无论是由真推假还是由假推真,逻辑悖论其实反映了我们思维方式的深刻性。悖论看似是严格依据逻辑规律而推导出来的,但实质上它们极有可能违反了某些逻辑规律,抑或是预设前提就是错误的等等,例如语义语音的复杂性就会混乱人们的思维而导致悖论发生。国内外的专家学者在分析逻辑悖论成因的基础上,为了彻底解决这些悖论、让人们得到更加清晰的认识而不懈地努力着。罗素的类型论、"恶性循环"原则,塔斯基的语言层次理论,克里普克的"有根性"以及伯奇的"语境敏感"的解决方案就是悖论消解方法中的一些代表。

Just as the proposition that the moving arrow is unmoved, logic is flawed; which is called logical paradox. Actually, logical paradox mirrors the profound way of thinking of human beings, whether the true proposition is deduced by the false proposition or vice versa. Logical paradox seems to be derived strictly according to the logical law, but it is likely that they have violated some logical laws, or the presupposition is wrong, e.g. the complexity of semantics and pronunciation, which usually confuses people's thinking, will result in logical paradox. On the basis of the causes of logical paradox, experts and scholars at home and abroad are working tirelessly in order to solve these paradoxes completely and let people get more clear understanding. Such theories as Russell's Type Theory and Vicious Circle Principle, Tarski's Hierarchy of Languages, Kripke's Groundedness Theory and Birch's Solutions to Sensitive Contexts are representative solutions to logical paradox.