摘要
学术界对于乾嘉考据学派的争论旷日持久,主要围绕吴派、皖派、扬州学派的派系问题,莫衰一是。本文从具体的文献材料出发,认为:学派的划分,若为便于地域文化研究则有益,若注目在树门立派上则有失。戴震与惠栋皆以探求古圣贤之道为目的,虽有求古与求是之别,但舍古无以求是;而扬州诸儒的学术成就,只是戴学在扬州地域得到更广泛的传播和阐扬而已;并且戴震的学术影响所及更为广远,至今犹有余风。
The academic circles have not stopped arguing,so this article embarks from the material to study it.We think that if it is in the local way to conduct the research,it can facilitate speech and may carry on the coherent discussion.Otherwise,it has mistakes.Dai Zhen and Hui Dong both pursue the saints and sages’truth as an ultimate goal.Although they have the different places,they are basically same.Scholars in Yangchow develop Dai Zhens academics in this dissemination,and we may say that Dai Zhens academic spirit still has the very vital significance and influence today.
出处
《徽学》
2006年第1期299-325,共27页
Journal of Hui Studies
关键词
戴震
交往
影响
乾嘉学术
Dai Zhen
influence
inter course
academic