摘要
古典刑事学派的过失犯罪理论认为,违反心理注意义务,是认定疏忽大意过失犯罪主观责任的前提和基础。通过对这一原理的实践弊端和理论缺陷的分析,并根据人的行为受其主观意志的支配这一辩证唯物主义原理,指出:违反应当注意或者应当预见的义务,不应成为疏忽大意过失犯罪的主观要件;只有行为主体的不法意志才是认定其主观责任的基础。
?The theory of classical criminology thinks that the precondition and base of the cognizance of subjective responsibility due to neglectful misstep is the disobeying of the obligation of mental notice. The authors analyze the practical abuse and theoretic limitation of the theory above. According to the materialistic theory that the human beings action is controlled by his subjective purpose, the authors point out that the disobeying of the responsibility which should be noticed or forecasted cannot be the subjective element of the crime due to neglectful misstep, and that only the doers' illegal purpose can be the base of subjective responsibilitys cognizance.
出处
《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》
2003年第1期48-50,共3页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词
疏忽大意
主观责任
注意预见义务
?neglectful
subjective responsibility
obligation of notice and forecast