期刊文献+

非谓语动词类型和任务类型对外语学习者组句能力的影响

Effects of Non-finite Type and Task Type on EFL Learners'Sentence Combining
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文从任务类型和非谓语类型角度研究了外语学习者的组句能力。任务类型包括合并句子和组句改错两个部分。非谓语动词类型由动词不定式、分词和动名词构成。重复测量方差分析表明,任务类型和非谓语动词类型对外语学习者组句能力均有显著性影响。非谓语动词类型比任务类型的影响更为明显,任务类型和非谓语动词类型在学习者组句能力上有明显的交互作用。 This study investigates the effects of non-finite type and task type on EFL learners'sentence combining.Task type consists of two levels:sentence connection and error correction for combined sentences.Productive knowledge is testified by test of sentence combination and receptive knowledge is testified by test of error correction.Non-finite type is categorized in 3 types:infinite,participle and gerund.As a repeated MANOVA indicates that both task type and non-finite type have main effect on EFL learners'sentence combining and non-finite type has stronger explanatory than task type on EFL learners'sentence combining.Besides,there is an interaction effect between task type and non-finite type.
作者 张蕾
机构地区 南京工业大学
出处 《海外英语》 2012年第19期38-39,共2页 Overseas English
关键词 任务类型 非谓语动词类型 组句能力 non-finite type task type sentence combining
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Crowhurst,M.Syntactic Complexity and Teachers’ Quality Ratings of Narrations and Arguments[].Research in the Teaching of English.1980
  • 2Kameen P.Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality[].On TESOL’’:The Learn er in Focus.1979
  • 3鲍贵.英语学习者语言复杂性变化对比研究[J].现代外语,2010,33(2):166-176. 被引量:75
  • 4Berman,R.A.,L.Verhoeven.Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development oftext-production abilities:Speech and writing[].Written Language and Literacy.2002
  • 5鲍贵.英语学习者作文句法复杂性变化研究[J].外语教学与研究,2009,41(4):291-297. 被引量:99
  • 6Crowhurst,M.Syntactic complexity andwriting quality:A review[].Canadian Journalof Education.1983

二级参考文献48

  • 1文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇变化的趋势与特点[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(3):189-195. 被引量:116
  • 2文秋芳.英语专业学生口语词汇进步模式研究[J].外语电化教学,2006(4):3-8. 被引量:23
  • 3Bardovi-Harlig, K. & T. Bofman. 1989. Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11. 17-34.
  • 4Beers, S. & W. Nagy. 2007. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? OL]. http://www. springerlink, com/content/326811575526h8t8 /fulltext. pdf (accessed 05/03/2008).
  • 5Berman, R. & L. Verhoeven. 2002. Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing[J]. Written Language and Literacy 5: 1-43.
  • 6Crowhurst, M. 1980. Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels [J].Canadian Journal of Education 5. 6-13.
  • 7Crowhurst, M. 1983. Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review[J]. Canadian Journal of Education 8: 1-16.
  • 8Faigley, L. 1979. The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen [J]. Research in the Teaching of English 13: 197-206.
  • 9Flahive, D. &B. Snow. 1980. Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions [A]. In J. Oiler & K. Perkins (eds.). Research in Language Testing[C]. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House. 171-176.
  • 10Homburg, T. 1984. Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? [J]. TESOL Quarterly 18: 87-107.

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部