期刊文献+

天长地久有时尽,此恨绵绵无绝期——从互文性视角解读中西悼亡诗《梦亡妻》和《江城子》

An interpretation of Jiang Cheng Zi and To Your Deceased Wife from the perspective of intertextuality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 悼亡诗是爱情诗的一种独特典型,融合了爱情和死亡的诗歌两大主题。苏轼的《江城子》和弥尔顿的《梦亡妻》是中西方著名的悼亡诗,拥有着相同的主题——都是以记梦的方式来悼念已故的妻子,语言优美,情感真挚,千古流传。但由于时空差异,中西方文化、宗教、历史的影响,相同主题的两首诗也必然各有千秋。该文拟从互文性角度对两首诗词进行解读,比较其主题内容、修辞手段及体裁结构的异同,进而分析其存在的深刻文化差异。 As a typical of loving poem, mourning poem combines the two topic of love and death together. Su shi’s Jiang Cheng Zi and John Milton’s To Your Deceased Wife are the famous mourning poems in China and western which have the same topic—mourning for their deceased wife. What’s more, both the poems used dream as a method to recall and mourn for their wives. As for the beautiful language and sincere affection expressed by them, their poems are passed generation by generation for thousand years. However, differences do exist between the two poems because of the different culture, religion and history of the two countries. This paper aims to compare the similarities as well as differences between the two poems in the perspective of intertextuality, so as to explore the deep culture differences between the two countries.
作者 于海利
出处 《海外英语》 2013年第12X期206-207,220,共3页 Overseas English
关键词 互文性 苏轼《江城子》 弥尔顿《梦亡妻》 intertextuality Sushi Jiang Cheng Zi John Milton To Your Deceased Wife
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1李小坤,庞继贤.互文性:缘起、本质与发展[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,39(4):152-155. 被引量:36
  • 2程锡麟.互文性理论概述[J].外国文学,1996(1):72-78. 被引量:380
  • 3四达外研语言研究部编写,张鑫友主编.《英国文学史及选读》学习指南[M]. 湖北科学技术出版社, 2003
  • 4Fairclough N.Discourse and Social Change. Journal of Women s Health . 1992
  • 5Leech Geoffrey N.A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry,1969.

二级参考文献10

  • 1KRISTEVA J.Word,Dialogue and Novel[M]//T.MOI,ed.The Kristeva Reader.Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1986:39.
  • 2米哈伊尔·巴赫金.陀思妥耶夫斯基诗学问题:复调小说理论[M].白春仁,顾亚铃,译.北京:三联书店,1988:343-344.
  • 3秦海鹰.互文性问题研究[EB/OL].(2007-11-06)[2008-06-06]http:./flc.swust.edu.cn/wgyy/sbzn/200711/989.shtml,2007.
  • 4BARTHES R.Oeuvres Completes:tumes 2-3[M].Pads:Seuil,1994:495.
  • 5BANNET E T.Structurallsm and the Logic of Dissent:Barthes,Derrida,Foucauh,Lacan[M].London:Macmillan Press,1989:244.
  • 6FOUCAULT M.The Archaeology of Knowledge[M].London:Tavistock Publications,1972:99.
  • 7FARCLOUGH N.Discourse and Social Change[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1993:84-102.
  • 8FMRCLOUGH N.Critical Discourse Analysis:The critical study of language[M].London:Longman,1995:131.
  • 9路易丝·麦克尼.福柯[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1999..
  • 10蒂费纳·萨莫瓦约.互文性研究[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2003..

共引文献446

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部