摘要
As seemingly persuasive as Chomsky's theory is, it is significantly flawed in four aspects: 1. ignoring a much fundamental creative force in early infancy; 2. equation of first-language learning with second-language learning; 3. methodology; 4. employment of terms.
As seemingly persuasive as Chomsky’s theory is, it is significantly flawed in four aspects:1. ignoring a much fundamen?tal creative force in early infancy; 2. equation of first-language learning with second-language learning; 3. methodology;4. em?ployment of terms.
出处
《海外英语》
2013年第13期1-3,共3页
Overseas English
