期刊文献+

权势距离理论新探索——以《甄嬛传》中甄嬛的话语为语料进行分析论证

Further Exploration of Power & Distance Theory——Zhen Huan's Discourse as the Corpora to Analyze and Prove the Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在面子理论中决定说话人采用何种策略的三个主要因素是权势、距离和要求度。面子威胁行为的轻重是说话者与听话者之间的社会距离、听话者与说话者之间权势差异以及要求度的结合。Scollon将权势、距离和要求度分别分成正和负。我们这里对权势距离理论进行新探索,将权势、距离和要求度分别分成正、零和负,再结合Watts的公式将《甄嬛传》中甄嬛的话语作为语料进行分析论证。结果表明新的划分方法很合理,在分析面子威胁行为的轻重时更为实用。 Power difference, social distance and the ranking of impositions are the three main factors deciding which politeness strategy to choose in the face-threatening act. The weightiness of a face-threatening act is a combination of the social distance be?tween speaker and hearer, the power differential between the hearer and speaker, and the ranking of impositions. Scollon divides power into plus power and minus power, the same with social distance and the ranking of imposition. In this thesis, power is divid?ed into plus power, zero power and minus power, so do social distance and the ranking of impositions. The analyze of Zhen Huan ’s discourse based on Watts' equation and the new theory proves that the new division is more proper and practical than the old ones in measuring the weightiness of face-threatening act.
作者 周晓露
出处 《海外英语》 2015年第13期234-236,共3页 Overseas English
关键词 权势 距离 要求度 礼貌策略 power difference social distance the ranking of impositions politeness strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1沈凌燕,林美玟.无意而为的面子威胁行为[J].东华大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(4):67-70. 被引量:5
  • 2赵东方,董广才.译者即交际者——读哈提姆与梅森《字幕翻译中的礼貌》[J].大连大学学报,2006,27(5):26-28. 被引量:3
  • 3Hatim & Mason.2000.Politeness in Screen Translating[M].Lawrence Venuti.Translation Studies Reader.London& New York:Roudedge.
  • 4Jean Stilwell Peccei.1999.Pragmatics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 5George Yule.2000.The Study of Language[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 6Bourdieu,P.& L.J.D.Wacquant.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology [M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1992.
  • 7Brown,P.& S.C.Levinson.Politeness:Some[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1987.
  • 8Eelen,G.A Critique of Politeness Theories [M].Manchester:St.Jerome,2001.
  • 9Fraser,B.Perspectives on politeness [J].Journal of Pragmatics,1990,(14):219-236.
  • 10Lakoff G.& M.Johnson.Philosophy in the Flesh:The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [M].New York:Basic Books,1999.

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部