隐喻干扰效应及其影响因素
摘要
隐喻干扰效应(MIE)的发现证明了隐喻理解的自动性,通过比较MIE的大小可探讨理解隐喻表达的过程与机制。研究实验通过要求被试者判断不同类型表达式是否为字面错误的MIE测试,探讨语境及个人差异因素对隐喻理解的影响。结果表明支持性的语境以及智商、词汇量、工作记忆等个人条件越好,能帮助理解隐喻含义。
出处
《海外英语》
2017年第7期211-212,共2页
Overseas English
二级参考文献21
-
1Bowdle, B. F., Gentner, D. 2005. The Career of Meta- phor[J].Psychological Review, 112(1) : 193--216.
-
2Chiappe, D. L., Chiappe, P. 2007. The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2): 172--188.
-
3Clement, C. A., Gentner, D. 1991. Systematicity as a se- lection constraint in analogical mapping[J].Cognitive Sci- ence, 15(1): 89-132.
-
4Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F. 2001. Convention, form, and figurative language processing[J].Metaphor Symbol, 16(3--4) : 223--247.
-
5Gentner, D., Wolff, P. 1997. Alignment in the Process- ing of Metaphor[J].Journal of Memory and Language, 37 (3) : 331--355.
-
6Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., Bookin, H.B. 1982. On Un- derstanding Nonliteral Speech: Can People Ignore Meta- phors? [J].Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behav- ior, 21(1).. 85--98.
-
7Gibbs, R. W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding[M].New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
-
8Gibbs, R.W. 2001. Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding[J].Metaphor Symbol, 16(3--4) : 317--333.
-
9Giora, R. 2002. Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? [J].Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4): 487--506.
-
10Glucksberg, S., Haught, C. 2006. On the relation be- tween metaphor and simile: When comparison fails[J]. Mind and Language, 21:360--378.
